THE SMART NEWS SOURCE | Feb 10 2010 10:48 | LAST UPDATED Feb 10 2010 10:48 |
|
Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe's ruling party will not accept a power-sharing deal that fails to recognise his re-election or seeks to reverse his land reform programme, a state-owned newspaper said on Friday. The conditions, which the Herald newspaper said were agreed at a Zanu-PF politburo meeting earlier this week, could dim prospects for a deal at negotiations between Mugabe's party and two factions of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change. The talks began on Thursday under South African mediation. They aim to break the deadlock over Mugabe's victory in a June 27 run-off election, boycotted by MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai because of violence and condemned by Western nations. "The meeting noted that there has to be a figure who appoints the all-inclusive government envisaged in the Memorandum of Understanding signed by the three parties on Monday," the government mouthpiece said. "And that figure is President Mugabe who won the run-off." The newspaper also said Zanu-PF would never agree to a national unity government that sought to reverse Mugabe's controversial seizure of thousands of white-owned firms to give to landless black Zimbabweans. Critics say the farm seizures helped wreck the once prosperous economy and bring food shortages and inflation now running at two-million percent, but the opposition has said it would not go back on the land seizures. Tight deadline African governments see a national unity government as the only way to reverse the economic meltdown and avert an escalation of political violence in Zimbabwe. Tsvangirai withdrew from the election run-off after attacks on his supporters by pro-Mugabe militia in which he says 120 activists were killed. Mugabe, in power since independence from Britain in 1980, blames the opposition for the bloodshed. Tsvangirai won a first round vote in March but failed to win the absolute majority required to avoid a second round. The MDC leader had demanded that the government recognise his victory in the March poll and halt all violence against the opposition as pre-conditions for talks. He agreed on Monday to go ahead with negotiations without any iron-clad guarantees. A spokesperson for Tsvangirai's MDC on Friday said the party would not accept any negotiations based on the June 27 result. "We have a pact not to talk to the media, but if that is their [Zanu-PF] position, it is unfortunate for the country. Our position is clear that June 27 is controversial and it, therefore, falls away," the MDC's Nelson Chamisa told Reuters. "It is not admissible as a parameter guiding the engagement," Chamisa added. South African President Thabo Mbeki, who has been mediating the Zimbabwe crisis since 2007, has said the Zimbabwean parties face a tight two-week deadline to conclude the talks, which are expected to be tense. The parties sharply disagree over how long a national unity government should remain in power. Tsvangirai's MDC wants fresh elections held as soon as possible, while Mugabe wants to carry on with his new five-year mandate. Laurence Caromba, a researcher at the Centre for International Political Studies at the University of Pretoria, said the idea of allowing Mugabe and his Zanu-PF to remain in power may be unacceptable to many Zimbabweans. "South African mediators hope to square this circle by advocating for a government of national unity, but this idea flatly ignores the wishes of the Zimbabwean people," Caromba said in an analysis of the crisis. Process of dialogue Meanwhile, South Africa and the European Union on Friday began their first summit in the French city of Bordeaux with Pretoria set to defend and jealously guard its mediating role in Zimbabwe. The key event was kicked off by French President Nicolas Sarkozy -- whose country holds the rotating presidency of the EU -- South Africa's Thabo Mbeki and European Commission chief José Manuel Barroso. The meet has been overshadowed by the political crisis in Zimbabwe and the diametrically opposed stands of Pretoria and Brussels on ways of resolving the impasse. The EU on Tuesday widened sanctions against Zimbabwe despite a deal brokered by Mbeki between Mugabe and Tsvangirai on talks for a future government. Brussels views Mugabe as a tyrant who has crushed human rights and democracy and led the once-model African economy to ruin and burdened with the world's highest inflation rate. Mbeki, on the other hand, has so far failed to publicly criticise Mugabe, and appears opposed to any attempt to arm-twist the octogenarian leader and to bow to any form of Western pressure. "Our view is that there has been a major step forward in the process of dialogue in Zimbabwe thanks to the tireless and behind the scenes effort of President Mbeki," said South African foreign ministry spokesperson Ronnie Mamoepa. "We want all those parties who have a genuine desire for a resolution of the crisis in Zimbabwe to give the current peace process a strong boost," Mamoepa added. A source at the European Commission said: "Zimbabwe is always on the agenda during meetings with the South Africans but we are not expecting anything significant." Mamoepa on Friday slammed Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga for speaking out on the Zimbabwean situation and insisting that Mugabe release all political prisoners. "We are not aware of the accreditation of Prime Minister Odinga as a mediator on the Zimbabwean question," Mamoepa said. "Odinga is demanding that President Mugabe release all political prisoners and to host teleconferences, but in what capacity?" he added. - Reuters, AFP TOPICS IN THIS ARTICLE
Comments
When a country gains independence, that means self governing and self determination on all aspects of everyday running of the country. The prospects are not dim, but they are dim for those who had agenda of reversing all the gains of independence. Land being at the centre of all the problems, these all Africa should fight to gain complete controll of their resources. In the US and Europe all the land belongs to the natives, so why should the natives of Africa just be tenants in their own countries, and the foreigners or settlers be the landlords.
Thuthukani Mkhize on July 25, 2008, 3:17 pm
Odinga is trying to get Tsvangirai in the same job he holds in Kenya. They are friends. He is teaching him the game. Everybody wants their name up in lights. Kenya is falling apart. Didn't Odinga see what is happening to Brown in Uk". He is about to be thrown out on his rear from Downing St. He had better go pay attention to the lives of his people that he claims he fought so deperately to improve. Kenya and Zim are not the same. I also take issue with the write of this article. For what it's worth, two black brothers are sitting together and trying to hammer out a deal. Why do you write this fatalistic article?. You spread doom and gloom like a pay-day pauper. They are TRYING to save Zim. The prospects are dim for the land thieves not the indiginous people. Why don't you go home and go wash clothes or cook or farm?. OOps!. I forgot. You can't farm, the Africans got the farms from Mugabe.
wendy h on July 26, 2008, 12:57 am
Right, gain control of the resources, that's exactly what has been happening with Mugabe's cronies and sychophants. Big question what resources do you think are left that are not in his own and his friends Swiss (or other) bank accounts. Oh yes, excluding those which have been sold to Zimbabwe's new colonial masters, China, South Africa etc. He sold your birthright for a 'mess of potage". Sorry its all gone.
Andrew Lawrence on July 26, 2008, 4:05 pm
It is not true to say that in Europe and America all the land belongs to the natives. Anyone can buy land in Britain whether native or not. Most of the best properties in London are owned by foreigners. The Russians can buy football clubs; the Indians can buy car companies; the Arabs can buy casinos. The basic principle of the British economic system is that free trade and open investment policies benefit everyone in the society, "native" or not. Countries like tiny Singapore have become rich since independence because they understood economics. Too bad nobody in Zimbabwe's government does.
Chris Wijnberg on July 28, 2008, 1:47 am
It came as no suprise that the oldest and most reviled political scum crawling the African political landscape (Omar Bongo, Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo and Paul Biya) were the first ones to congratulate Mugabe for his savage and most shameful political acrobatics. For once, I just hope these ancient creatures of West Africa can leave us alone to sort out Southern African problems. Zimbabwe refugees are chocking South Africa, Botswana and Zambia, not Malabo, Yaounde or Gabon, its about time they minded their own damn business.
Patrick Nawa on July 29, 2008, 3:53 am
click here to log in
M&G Online Comment Guidelines In Brief
Advertising Links
|
2,3-million titles to choose from.
iPod nano 16GB - Black, Was R2,499.00 Now R2,299.00! Save R200!
46 000 DVDs and Blu-Ray on sale now!
100s of new releases now in stock. Get the new Sade & Bon Jovi albums.
Widest toy range and unbeatable prices!
AdvertisementsAdvertising links |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||






