THE SMART NEWS SOURCE | Feb 10 2010 06:33 | LAST UPDATED Feb 10 2010 06:33 |
|
Sport mirrors life in more ways than mere emotion. A winning team provides a wonderfully meaningless reason for a gloomy nation to smile, and a losing team provides an even more absurd excuse for a prosperous one to scowl. But just as economies face natural upswings and downturns, sports teams are not guaranteed a smooth ride between peaks and troughs. Shit happens. And in the case of South Africa's one-day cricket team in England, life without Shaun Pollock is hitting home very hard indeed. "It took a little while to take effect but, if anybody didn't realise what a great player he was, they do now. For over a decade he gave us control at both ends of the innings, and usually of the game, and that's before we even consider his power-hitting and the runs he scored," says coach Mickey Arthur. No successful team relies on just one man, of course, and this one has been equally affected by the defections of almost a dozen all-rounders in the last couple of seasons: Andrew Hall, Justin Kemp, Nicky Boje and Johan van der Wath all became seasoned international cricketers capable of producing match-winning performances as back-ups to Pollock and Jacques Kallis, but all retired prematurely to pursue the easy cash on offer in county cricket and India's Twenty20 leagues. Tyron Henderson, Dale Benkenstein, Zander de Bruyn and Alfonso Thomas could all "do a job" at international level, while any selector guided by performance rather than age or reputation wouldn't hesitate to include Lance Klusener, who turned 37 this week. Suddenly, with Pollock gone too, Kallis out of form and the only other all-rounder worthy of the name, Albie Morkel, injured, South Africa were caught with their pants down. The fact that England were captained by Kevin Pietersen during the series rout turned embarrassment into abject humiliation. The former KwaZulu-Natalian reckons he knows a thing or two about South Africa's inability to look ahead and plan for the future and would, no doubt, have been amused by the lack of depth in the Proteas squad. After all, he might say, he could have been batting in the out-of-form AB de Villiers's place at number four if selectors and administrators in the land of his birth weren't so distracted. On that subject, the premature retirement of Charl Langeveldt created another significant hole in the ODI team. Anybody who harboured the slightest doubts about the former Boland prison warder's merits need only look at the team's inability to bowl three good deliveries in succession at the moment to see how valuable he had become as Pollock's lieutenant at the top and bottom of the innings before he left for Derbyshire. Almost 40 South Africans played county cricket during this English summer, and the vast majority of them renounced their country to do so. One happily accepted the money a couple of months ago and remained convinced that South African cricket's health was "okay". Now, after 10 weeks in an English change room, his views have changed. "The Kolpak ruling is killing our cricket. Unless we start getting guys to come back and contribute, we'll simply feed the English game. I learned so much -- we had four or five international guys in the team and we discussed techniques and tactics, how to win games and how to behave as professionals. "At the franchise last season the conversation was pretty much based around who had the girlfriend with the biggest tits," said the player, understandably preferring not to be named. "We recognise the damage that the ruling is doing to our game but it's only controllable from that end. What can we do to prevent a cricketer from accepting a contract worth three times as much as he can earn here?" asks frustrated South African Cricketers' Association chief executive Tony Irish. "The English authorities are putting measures in place to make it more difficult for our players to sign Kolpak contracts by working with the government to make work permits more difficult to obtain but, as I have always said, we are fighting impossible odds to keep the players -- financial gravity is impossible to resist," Irish said. One man who may yet be persuaded to return is the outstanding Eagles all-rounder, Ryan McLaren, a man who should have been awarded an international cap three years ago as a reward for outstanding domestic performances. But in some ways sports administrators can be as myopic and selfish as city bankers, obsessed with short-term success to win the next match or hit the financial target so as to make the year-end bonus. Unlike the long list of all-rounders mentioned above, however, McLaren is still only 25 and may yet prove to be an outstanding investment should Cricket South Africa see fit to buy him out of his recently extended contract with Kent. Shaun Pollock is irreplaceable and McLaren could do without the burden of a nation expecting him to take 400 ODI wickets and score almost 4 000 runs, but he could be better than anyone else. South Africa's woes, however, have detracted from the performances of an England team that has, for the most part, been comically inept at one-day cricket for 15 years. Some say Pietersen's arrival as captain was purely coincidental, but that would be to misunderstand the situation. His "un-Englishness" is precisely the reason the team is playing so well. For centuries Englishmen have cared far too deeply about their sport to reach their potential. They have been too distracted by issues of "fair play" and good manners to be effective. Not so with Pietersen. He couldn't be bothered with Andrew Flintoff's statistics this season or whether Steve Harmison deserved to be in the team or not, he just knew Flintoff was his best all-rounder and that Harmison was the best fast bowler and to hell with the consequences. There was no agonising over what "message" that would send to other, plodding county cricketers who may have thought themselves ahead in the queue for the national team. Sure, Pietersen is full of self-belief. But it's also a damn sight easier to be that when you know, in your heart of hearts, that it's someone else's team you are captaining. Englishmen have to steel themselves to play and lead without the fear of failure. The good news is that the economy will be strong again and so will South Africa's one-day team. The bad news is that, while the cricket team will take a couple of years to come right, the economy may take a lot longer. TOPICS IN THIS ARTICLE
Comments
I think we all new our last fiasco in one day cricket was inevitable and it was only a matter of time before the dark cloud of failure loomed heavily over the wilting Proteas. I am sorrybut I must blame the Administrators and Selectors entirely for the present Circus. The first mistake was excluding Pollack from the test team as he is still the best bowler we have and no mean all rounder. To exclude him from test cricket was an insult to a fine individual and it was obvious such action would force him into early retirement. Strydom and Arthur should be big enough to admit their stupidity. The second mistake was replacing Mckenzie with "brainless" Gibbs who has prooved over the years his lifestyle does not augur well for reliability. The third mistake was expecting inexperienced players such as Philander to just fit in and play International cricket. I doubt if the harm done can be rectified by the time we tour Australia at the end of the year and i think we are heading for another big embarrassment.
Ray Miller on September 5, 2008, 11:16 am
Sheesh, what a load of hogwash! At least you're right about KP. He is THE reason England beat us in the one-days. It's quite ironic: South Africa is captained by a man who consciously modelled his career after English captains (I guess some still believe the English way is by definition the right way). England, on the other hand, is benefiting from a South African captain in the mould of Clive Rice, Kepler Wessels and Hansie Cronjé (are we allowed to speak his name yet?).
Your comments about Shaun Pollock are statistically true, but misleading. Pollock has not bowled at the death for the last five years (or more). And there is a simple reason for that: his tendency to disappear for 20+ runs an over. Ask yourself this: How low might Fanie de Villiers' average be if he did not have to bowl those slog overs? The current pathetic form of the one-day team has very little to do with Pollock's POST mature retirement. The wailing about all the cricketers who chose money above the noble cause of patriotic duty is only part of the story. Would these guys leave so quickly is it were not for Cricket SA's disastrous affirmative action policies? Lest we forget, affirmative action got Charl Langeveldt (who is supposed to benefit from it) to jump ship. Talk about a bad execution. In true African (and I don't mean black) view of the world, Manthorp presents this as if Cricket SA is the victim. Nothing could have been done to avoid the disaster. By implication, nobody is responsible, and nothing needs to change. The fans just need to keep quiet for the next decade or so, and pray for the best. What hold do these guys have on you, Neil? The truth is that this fiasco shows Cricket SA's inability to manage the pool of talent at its disposal. Keeping the talent happy and interested while pursuing affirmative action won't be easy, but that's what Cricket SA's many managers get paid to do. If they are unable to perform, they need to be replaced. Let's hope Norman Arendse gets shoved aside soon, no thanks to Neil Manthorp. The basic reason why SA lost so badly (all teams loose occasionally, but few loose this badly), was the lack of focus from the squads most experienced players. As KP showed, a good captain can keep his charges motivated (and fit - but it does not help if you are overweight yourself). In fairness, this is also the coach's job. Between Mickey and his Mullet, they are obviously not getting this done. Mickey's blaming of the youngsters for the teams woeful form was very embarrassing, not to mention inaccurate. A word about the Mullet: when we last toured England in 2003, he was compared to Don Bradman himself. Not for style or technique, but for sheer weight of runs. Since that tour, I doubt anybody mentioned the two in the same sentence again. Perhaps relieving Mullet of the captaincy would allow him to bat to his full potential. One can only hope. Recall that Mullet's inability to get along with Lance Klusener is a large part of why Klusener is now scoring runs for his county, as opposed to his country. We have always been told that Graeme Smith will learn the job of captaincy through experience. It is becoming increasingly obvious that after 5 years of on-the-job training, he has learned preciously little. The one-day team today is just as unfocused and unmotivated as back in 2004 when we got whitewashed in Sri Lanka. That series cost coach Eric Simons his job. It's time to extend the same courtesy to Mickey. And this time, the Mullet needs to be included.
Coenraad Pretorius on September 16, 2008, 2:42 am
click here to log in
M&G Online Comment Guidelines In Brief
Advertising Links
|
2,3-million titles to choose from.
iPod nano 16GB - Black, Was R2,499.00 Now R2,299.00! Save R200!
46 000 DVDs and Blu-Ray on sale now!
100s of new releases now in stock. Get the new Sade & Bon Jovi albums.
Widest toy range and unbeatable prices!
AdvertisementsAdvertising links |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||






