THE SMART NEWS SOURCE | Feb 10 2010 07:32 | LAST UPDATED Feb 10 2010 07:32 |
|
Six months after the elections, Zimbabwe still lacks a functioning government and is on the verge of a humanitarian catastrophe. Following the worst wheat harvest since the independence war, bread has run out and sugar supplies are set to follow. USAid, the American government humanitarian agency, is warning that the country could run out of the maize, the staple food, by next month. Farming officials say the government's stated aim of producing maize on 500 000 hectares this season is unattainable. "We are in serious trouble," said Jabulani Gwaringa, of the Zimbabwe Farmers' Union (ZFU), which represents small-scale operators. "There is no seed, fertiliser and crop chemicals on the market. Banks are not offering farmers any credit. In July we had produced about 25 000 metric tonnes of seed maize. We are down to 9 000 because farmers opted to eat their hybrid seed or sell it to millers." One European diplomat said: "We are already hearing isolated reports of child deaths from hunger." In the poorest provinces, such as Matabeleland North, subsistence farmers have begun bartering their livestock for maize: one cow buys six buckets of maize, while four live chickens or a goat buy one bucket. President Robert Mugabe is still locked in negotiations with opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai to try to break the deadlock over Cabinet posts which is threatening a crucial power-sharing deal. However, the state of the agricultural sector is forming an increasingly alarming backdrop to the talks, which have gone on almost since the disputed elections were held on 29 March. Since Mugabe let his so-called war veterans loose on the mainly white-owned commercial farms in 2000, the government claims to have resettled six million poor black Zimbabweans on the land. The figure is impossible to verify, but the most obvious outcome has been the collapse of the agriculture sector. In 1998 production of tobacco, flowers, maize and other vegetables yielded 18% of GDP and 45% of foreign currency earnings. Since Mugabe launched his land acquisition offensive, the number of commercial farmers has dwindled from 4 500 to less than 800. While evicted commercial farmers are looking to the future power-sharing government to allow them back onto their properties, the issue is still in the balance. In a little-noticed concession to Zanu-PF, the September 15 agreement underlines the "irreversibility" of "the compulsory acquisition and redistribution of land ... since 2000" and agrees that Britain will pay compensation. The MDC has claimed that it accepted the "irreversibility" clause by insisting on a land audit which will define what belongs to whom. The problem still has not been resolved, raising questions as to whether commercial farmers will return and reinvest in Zimbabwe. Trevor Gifford, the Commercial Farmers' Union president, said that even an international effort over the next six weeks would not be enough to save the coming season. "It might be possible to raise enough maize seed for 360 000 hectares -- which is a third of the maize area that was planted in 2000 -- but we will never get enough fertiliser because there is a world shortage and the price has tripled. It is already clear that Zimbabwe will need food aid for the next 18 months at least." The World Food Programme has been feeding Zimbabweans since 2002 and expects to have to help up to 5,4-million people -- out of an estimated total population of eight to nine million -- between now and the next harvest in April 2009. USAid's Famine Early Warning Systems Network has said Zimbabwe needs to import more that 700 000 tonnes of cereals by then. As farmworkers, Joyce, her husband Innocent, and their eight children used to belong to a class of people who knew that, despite earning low wages, they would never starve in southern Africa's breadbasket. They are overlooked for foreign food aid because they live on farms, rather than in villages. But their situation is dire. "We do not have corn every day -- only from time to time. For us, even when there are vegetables, if we do not have maize meal it's like we didn't eat at all," said Innocent. "We cannot grow anything because the electric motor was stolen in the 'jambanja' [attack] so we cannot irrigate." The "jambanja" happened on 6 May after District Administrator Mike Mariga arrived with a group of armed men to take over their employers' farm. "They began by beating us," said Innocent, "to force us to go and get our employer's gun. When we refused, they threatened to harm our 12-year-old son." Their white employers -- who sustained serious injuries -- moved to Harare after the attack. 'They bring us wages and, usually, 50kg of maize meal. But last month they came without maize because they could not find any," said Innocent (56). The Tembos' employers are among 77 farmers who have been targeted for attack since they joined an international court action against the government's land acquisition programme. Later this month the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) tribunal in Windhoek, Namibia, is expected to find in the farmers' favour, potentially opening the door to sanctions against Zimbabwe from neighbouring countries. In daily propaganda broadcasts, the government blames international sanctions for all Zimbabwe's woes and trumpets its efforts to help communal farmers by giving them implements, tractors, scotch-carts [trailers], fuel, seed and fertiliser ahead of the rainy season, due to begin next month. "We do not know what we will eat when we have finished the corn you see here. Even if we had seed to plant, what is the point? There would be nothing to eat until February or March next year," said Innocent. - guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2008 TOPICS IN THIS ARTICLE
Comments
grant montgomery on October 5, 2008, 12:22 pm
So Zanu and MDC have agreed that Britain will pay compensation to Zimbabwean citizens for land confiscated by the Zimbabwean regime? As The UK is not party to that agreement, you can imagine what the British government's response to that will be.
Roger Pacey on October 5, 2008, 2:07 pm
Viva Mugabe, Mbeki and the African way of doing things,Viva!!! They need the white farmers desperately but will rather starve than admit it. In the meantime Mozmbique is smiling, because when Mugabe and Mbeki threw the white farmers away, they all moved there to produce, because that is what they do, against all opposition and factors. How long before these racists amongst us will also realise it, or will they carry on till SA is in exactly the same situation?, Or will they stop their hatred and farm-murders in time?
Hein Huyser on October 6, 2008, 6:56 am
Grant my friend.
As a British and EU taxpayer, i can tell you that the taxpayers of the UK and EU are absolutely fed up with seeing our hard earned money going into the pockets of corrupt African politicians. South African taxpayers must now financially prop up Zimbabwe. After all it is your ex president that supposedly concluded out this ridiculous deal that did not consider the wishes of the Zimbabwean people. How can three suspect politicians and a dithering mediator alone, carve up Zimbabwe as if it is their own? Where were the clerics, business people, womens organisations, trade unions and so on, involved in these talks? The current president of SADC has 13 wives who all have palaces. Why should we UK/EU taxpayers pay for Zimbabwe when he lives in the lap of luxury. Even your own South African politicians are obviously out to enrich themselves, whilst millions in South Africa starve. Instead of calling upon other countries like Britain to act, South Africans should be screaming from the rooftops that your future state president appears in court to prove his innocence on corruption charges, and that your ANC leader Motlanthe opens an enquiry into the alleged corrupt arms deal. After that, perhaps we UK/EU taxpayers will be willing to request our prime minister Gordon Brown to help Zimbabwe. Until that time -no way, South Africa must pay.
Frank Hartry on October 6, 2008, 9:36 am
Dear mr Hartry
Yes, I totaly agree with you that a lot of Southern African leaders are corrupt. Yes it would be great if we could have a judicial inquiry into the arms deal. It would be absolutely fantastic. As for English and other EU citizens not wanting to contribute aid to Africa, think again. Europe has a huge moral resposibility to aid Africa - this resposibility came about through the theft of naturual resources, land and people. By the 1790s there were 480,000 enslaved people in British Caribbean colonies alone. (Oh, and by the way 30,000 Afrikaner woman and children also died in British concentration camps, as well as 25,000 Africans.) Europe profited greatly from colonialism and slavery. Don't even deny this. Futhermore Africa might be a corrupt, but Europe and America supported corrupt governments for long periods of time when it suited their goals. I say this not to defend Mugabe, but just to stress the fact the aid to Africa and corruption cannot be linked - if you do that hundred of thousands will die. Kind Regards, GS van Zyl
GS van Zyl on October 6, 2008, 12:54 pm
Mnr Vanzyl.
For the next thousand years, Africa will seemingly be holding out the begging bowl to today's taxpayers of the UK and EU, because of the alleged sins of our ancestors. The Boer war was indeed a tragic blot on British history. Especially where thousands of women, children as well as Commonwealth forces negligently died of disease within and outside the concentration camps. Now in 2008, we UK/EU taxpayers do not feel that we are reponsible for Africa. More especially when the leaders of Africa live in the lap of luxury and most people in Europe do not. ie Your future state president is to be seen surrounded by dozens of bodyguards 24/7 and our prime minister only has one. Cut out this lavish Idi Amin type expenditure and we EU taxpayers may be more sympathetic.
Frank Hartry on October 6, 2008, 3:54 pm
Saying that Zim doesn't have the means to produce enough food because of the British is outrageous. I doubt that many of today's generation in industrialized nations really care what happens in Africa. It seems like a never ending cycle of violence, corruption, and inefficiency. Feed a country for one year, and seven years later there is either famine or 'revolution', and the people have done nothing in the interim to prepare. South Africa may well be heading down this path, with the ANC leading the way. This is not about the rape of Africa by the west, it is about economic efficiency and population control, and government that cares about its people.
David Hurst on October 6, 2008, 10:36 pm
Mr Hartry
I agree with many things you say, but would also like to stress the importance of targeted aid to Africa. Thus far indiscriminate aid given in good faith by the EU and the UK has been used by African leaders to enrich themselves. The only way that this will be done is for the people and governments in the UK and EU to make rather make donations for non governmental organisations or for specific projects and not to govenments directly. Although does not seem like it at this time, targeted sanctions against Mugabe and his cabal has had a definite impact. South Africa cannot affort to prop up Zimbabwe for much longer, and soon something drastic will happen. But please remember that there is also some good news in Africa... Botswana, Zambia, Namibia is on their way to become stable contries with stable economies - Angola and Mozambique is doing much better and there is clear signs of improvements. I lived in Mozambique for a year, and must tell you that much of what was accomplished in Mozambique was due to EU and UK aid. Kind Regards, GS van Zyl
GS van Zyl on October 7, 2008, 12:58 pm
click here to log in
M&G Online Comment Guidelines In Brief
Advertising Links
|
2,3-million titles to choose from.
iPod nano 16GB - Black, Was R2,499.00 Now R2,299.00! Save R200!
46 000 DVDs and Blu-Ray on sale now!
100s of new releases now in stock. Get the new Sade & Bon Jovi albums.
Widest toy range and unbeatable prices!
AdvertisementsAdvertising links |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||







In the 60's Britain oppted for Nigerian oil over honesty and justice. Now it's payback time and the British tax payer must support Zimbabwe - lekker!