THE SMART NEWS SOURCE | Feb 09 2010 21:41 | LAST UPDATED Feb 09 2010 21:41 |
|
The next time African National Congress (ANC) president Jacob Zuma steps into the Pietermaritzburg High Court, it may well be as the president of the Republic of South Africa. "When Zuma comes back to court in August he will come back as the president of this country and the judges will have to address him as the president," the party's youth league president, Julius Malema, said on Wednesday shortly after Zuma's brief appearance in court. "I just want to ask those who are behind this case if they would be proud to prosecute their own president, and embarrass their own country." Earlier Judge Leona Theron provisionally set down Zuma's next court appearance for August 25, when he was expected to apply for a permanent stay of prosecution. Senior counsel for French arms company Thint, Michael Collins, said they would return to the court on June 24 for their own permanent stay of prosecution application. Inkatha Freedom Party leader Mangosuthu Buthelezi warned that there could be dire consequences for the country should Zuma face his trial as the president of the country. "It will also be difficult in South Africa for our political system to project and promote honesty and integrity as its paramount values, when the sitting president is being prosecuted on corruption charges," he said. "It is not only in the interest of Mr Zuma, but in the interest of the entire country that this matter be finalised, sooner rather than later." Political analyst Professor Ufo Okeke Uzodike told journalists outside court that in the likely event that Zuma becomes president, it would not be positive for the country if he spent a "substantial" amount of his time in court. "One only hopes for a speedy resolution of this case. If it continues to drag on, it will take a lot of energy away from Mr Zuma and his group [when they should be] devoting their time to the affairs of the state, and it's not a good thing." He added that Zuma would not be the first president to face criminal charges in court. Zuma, meanwhile, refused to step down as ANC president and presidential forerunner. "What has happened to me is that certain people have thrown this dark cloud to me with the aim of demonising me," Zuma told a 5 000-strong crowd outside the court. "So if I step aside, a bad precedent will be created. People will know that if you hate somebody, you just throw a dark cloud and it is the end of the story. "I am not going to step aside simply because I have not been found guilty by any court of law. I respect the Constitution and I understand it." Zuma faces charges of corruption, fraud, money laundering and racketeering. The criminal charges against him and Thint were reinstated after the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled in favour of an appeal by the National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP). The NDPP had challenged a ruling last year by Pietermaritzburg High Court Judge Chris Nicholson, which held that the charges against Zuma were invalid. Some of the charges relate to alleged corrupt payments offered by Thint to Zuma in return for protection during a government probe into alleged irregularities in the country's multibillion-rand arms deal. National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) spokesperson Tlali Tlali said if Zuma were to win his Constitutional Court application on the validity of the prosecution against him, two options would be considered by the authority. One is that the NPA could decide to invite Zuma to make representations if the Constitutional Court finds that Zuma's interpretation of Section 179 (5)d of the Constitution was correct. This section sets out the right of a person facing prosecution to make representations to the prosecuting authority before being charged. Zuma has been arguing that the decision to prosecute him is invalid because when the authority reversed an earlier decision not to charge him, he wasn't asked to make representations. Or, said Tlali: "We could discontinue the prosecution." However, he added that it was too early to make these decisions because they did not know what orders would come out of the Constitutional Court. The justices of the Constitutional Court still had to decide whether they would hear Zuma's appeal against a Supreme Court of Appeal judgement that disagreed with Zuma's argument. This led to the charges against him being "unfrozen". Police spokesperson Superintendent Henry Budhram said no incidents of violence had been reported outside the Pietermaritzburg court. ANC spokesperson Jessie Duarte described the crowd as "disciplined". -- Sapa TOPICS IN THIS ARTICLE
Comments
"I just want to ask those who are behind this case if they would be proud to prosecute their own president, and embarrass their own country." asks Julius - Talk about embarrassing! As the late Helen Suzman was referenced recently "it is not the questions that are embarrassing the country but possibly the answers that are"
Brian Little on February 4, 2009, 6:14 pm
Very interesting assumptions you are making. Are you sure our president will return to court. My bet is the ANC will challenge the constitution and anything else with impunity until this problem "goes away". Sorry to be such a cynic but if this happens we will always have a president who will be assumed to have been guilty of corruption in the 'Court of Public Opinion". Jacob Zuma asked for his 'day in court', so why has he been trying to avoid it? Guilty, innocent... we will never know, what we do already know is that he chooses not to go to court! How will he go about fullfilling his promise to root our corruption in Government?
Andrew Lawrence on February 4, 2009, 7:07 pm
Malema and his arrogance is what is embarassing South Africa!
Bob ... sorry, I mean JZ ... it's time to show some leadership skills and do what is better for the country rather than better for your own personal interests. Step down and save the country this embarassment which Malema refers to. It's very simple!
Andrew Hicks on February 4, 2009, 7:26 pm
I think this is a mess & somebody destroyed the case from the start. I can't understand why Zuma was not prosecuted 5 yrs ago if there was evidence. I think this case should be sped up in the interest of the country.
Excellent
Excellent Mwelase on February 4, 2009, 8:54 pm
It could only embarrass the country if Zuma is found to be guilty ! Could it be that Malema also believes that Zuma will be found guilty if tried ???
Peter Win on February 4, 2009, 9:15 pm
I am wondering what axactly this battle against president of the ANC is heading to.I guess there is still a lot to be learned by Jullius Malema as he continue to issue unfounded statements after one another, what kind of leadership are we going to have in the near future?.
Aviwe Soya on February 4, 2009, 10:54 pm
Some really good points made here - it will indeed only be embarrassing if he's found guilty. I liked the quote from Helen Suzman too. All of this is assuming that the ANC wins the forthcoming elections though. I live in hope, hope for cope but can only cope with a DA vote.
Craig Millar on February 5, 2009, 9:51 am
The suggestion that Zuma has stalled the prosecution is false because only 2 out of 8 court appearances where from Zuma side.The people are hasty to point out the less than 6month delay caused by Zuma and forget the 8 years of the NPA why? People are irrational against Zuma and blame him for everything.And are infringing our constitution by convicting him before he has even been tried.But because it Zuma its ok.
Anyone could insult him spit on his face and it wouldn't be a big deal 'cause it's Zuma.People tend to forget that he too has feelings and for people to have such deep and unwarranted hate for you just because you came up against Mbeki ,who has unleashed the media on you.But to still remain resolute is exampliraly and I salute him.He is a true soldier. If anyone was in Jacob Zuma position I hope they have half the gall he has.The struggle goes on for Zuma as the SA public Oppresses him.Even if he were to be found not guilty ,they would not be content with that.Viva Zuma Viva!!!
zimbali khwela on February 5, 2009, 11:53 am
The JZ case has caused a lot of problems in the ANC and continues to do so and that hurts me as young black man with great love for the greatest black movement in the world,i think it is high time for the current NEC to relook the JZ Issue,it is either we are going to risk the country's values(as per Malema) or we(The ANC)are going to allow an individual to look at his personal problems at no cost to the organisation or the country.
Or will we see the ousting of yet another ANC President(JZ) in the next two years due to a vote of no confidence from parliament.
Mxolisi Mpangalasane on February 5, 2009, 12:43 pm
We may talk until the next eclipse....I believe if our leaders had our country's best interests at heart, they would stop with this bickering....from where I stand I don't see any of them being fit for running the country. If they were, they would consider what good does it do our country if they keep bickering like teenagers....We too in our country need a change. We need leaders who will not only consider themselves as human beings but as leaders who have been chosen to lead and therefore leave their lives setting out examples. We need leaders who will serve our needs and not their pockets. We don't need power mongers and money mongers. We need leaders with bigger views about our country and better plans to get there. How do we expect them to lead us us when they are busy fighting each other for the positions.....Fellow South Africans, these are our lives, we are blessed by a beautiful country, let us not drag it down.....
JJ from Western cape
Joyce Ndabankulu on February 5, 2009, 3:30 pm
Zimbali Khwela says "People are irrational against Zuma and blame him for everything.And are infringing our constitution by convicting him before he has even been tried. But because it Zuma its ok."
Zimbali if you are following what is happening in this Zuma case you will know what is the current issue right now. " JZ is trying by all means not to be tried, he is avoiding his day in court that he once ascked for. If he knows that he won't be convicted if he goes to court then why is he avoiding it ?
Ntlahla Mfingwana on February 6, 2009, 10:56 am
Judges, commentators, bias newsrooms, analysts and minor political parties can whinge until the sun hits the moon or vice versa, Zuma is not entering the gates of the jail. Not in my generation.
I can bet on that...
on February 6, 2009, 7:19 pm
Hello. Please have a look at the exclusive interview with omar abdulla from footprints filmworks and f w de klerk. Mr de klerk and abdulla chat about the future of south africa in ten years.
Thanks
Omar Abdulla on February 10, 2009, 9:58 pm
click here to log in
M&G Online Comment Guidelines In Brief
Advertising Links
|
2,3-million titles to choose from.
iPod nano 16GB - Black, Was R2,499.00 Now R2,299.00! Save R200!
46 000 DVDs and Blu-Ray on sale now!
100s of new releases now in stock. Get the new Sade & Bon Jovi albums.
Widest toy range and unbeatable prices!
AdvertisementsAdvertising links |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||






