THE SMART NEWS SOURCE | Feb 10 2010 08:45 | LAST UPDATED Feb 10 2010 08:45

ADVERTISE WITH US | CONTACT US | STORY TIP-OFFS | M&G NEWSLETTER

News \| National \| General

Bosasa's tender touch

ADRIAAN BASSON | JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA - Feb 13 2009 11:27

3 comments | Post your comment

The Auditor General wrote a scathing report on facilities management group Bosasa's lucrative contracts with the correctional services department as early as June 2006, the Mail & Guardian can reveal.

His spokesperson, Joreta Linde-Ferreira, said the Auditor General remained "uncomfortable, as the level of assurance sought regarding supply chain management was not forthcoming".

The Auditor General’s office handed records and other documents to the Special Investigating Unit (SIU), which is probing the Bosasa contracts and which aims to finalise its investigation within two months.

The M&G is in possession of a report sent by the Auditor General to former prisons boss Linda Mti after an investigation found the department had not adequately managed the Bosasa contracts.

The probe also found the department set inappropriate payment conditions, committed "fiscal dumping" by making huge payments at the end of the financial year and flouted its own procurement policies.

Ironically, the department’s former chief financial officer, Patrick Gillingham, responded on Mti’s behalf. The M&G revealed two weeks ago that Gillingham handed Bosasa confidential tender documents before they were publicly available. Last week the M&G exposed how Bosasa sponsored flights and luxury hotel stays for Mti.

The Auditor General investigated four tenders awarded to Bosasa companies.
It shows he:

Could find no proof that, department's IT personnel or the State Information Technology Agency (Sita) were involved in a tender process leading to the April 2005 award of a R237-million contract to Bosasa company Sondolo IT for the supply and installation of access control systems and CCTV in 66 prisons. "This contract has major IT implications," the Auditor General commented. Gillingham replied that the focus of the tender was more on security hardware than computer software.

Criticised the extension of the contract to include the staffing of control rooms at the 66 prisons to Sondolo. The Auditor General found that the
staffing contract, which made Sondolo an extra R56-million a year, exceeded the limit by adding more than 20% to the original contract price. Gillingham replied that by outsourcing, the department saved R2-million a month and that the extension complied with the department’s procurement manual.

Found that "abnormal payment terms" were included in the tender document, whereby 90% of the price was to be paid for equipment after installation and 10% after the installation was successfully commissioned and ran to the department’s satisfaction for three months. Gillingham called the terms "reasonable".

Found that Sondolo IT was not listed on the department’s prospective suppliers’ list. Gillingham replied that any supplier could be used in an open bidding process.

Complained after visiting 13 prisons that no access control system was fully operational. Gillingham blamed Telkom for the delays.

The report also notes that invoices were not properly certified, that no proper project management was in place to ensure Sondolo delivered, and that the payment for control room staffing was made without an order and solely on Mti’s motivation. The Auditor General also took issue with a R487-million contract landed by Bosasa company Phezulu Fencing for security fencing at 66 prisons on December 9 2005, particularly querying its prices, which were not comparable with those of other bidders.

The M&G further showed that Bosasa had access to the fencing tender document months before it was formally published.

Gillingham responded that the department used public works department estimates, but enhanced these by including surveillance technology and detection systems.

CONTINUES BELOW

The Auditor General found that the first payment of R56,4-million to Phezulu Fencing was made on December 14 2005 -- five days after the contract was publicly awarded -- contravening payment conditions.

According to Gillingham, Phezulu Fencing indicated that it needed to make "substantial manufacturing deposits" with suppliers to ensure delivery deadlines were met.

During inspections in May 2006, the Auditor General’s office found that not all fences were erected by March 17 2006, the contracted date of completion. "By allowing the delivery date to be extended, other bidders may have been unfairly discriminated against," the report remarked.

Gillingham responded that at the compulsory briefing session for prospective bidders, the department indicated it would allow installation to continue beyond March 17 2006 but would penalise "unnecessary delays".

On a R224-million contract won by Sondolo IT for installation of 6 000 television monitors on March 10 2006, the Auditor General again remarked that he could not determine who wrote the tender specifications. The M&G has reported that Bosasa sent Gillingham a section of the tender document before the tender was advertised.

Gillingham responded that the tender document was compiled in consultation with the department’s IT staff and the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research.

The report also noted late delivery on the TV tender. Gillingham stated that the majority of equipment was still "bonded in the warehouses of the suppliers". The department this week instructed the SIU to do an urgent audit on the latest tender awarded to Bosasa Operations -- a R900-million catering contract in 31 prisons.

Annexure: The Auditor General’s report on Bosasa’s correctional services contracts. (PDF)

TOPICS IN THIS ARTICLE

People

Organisations

Comments

To all those political born again, BOSASA'S Tender irregularity happens under Mbeki's regime not Zuma.

Most follow up comments I know would be from those who used to be dinned, peppered, enjoyed privilleges of patronage and now are in political oblivion, Hence the joining of COPE.

Sipho Zulu on February 13, 2009, 12:17 pm

Hey adriaan, how about you do a report on why the SIU hasn't found anything or why the AG's reports haven't resulted in anything yet?

Oh yes, that's because the SIU HASNT found anything, and everything the AG asked was answered with reasonable substantiation and that just wouldn't make for a nice story now would it?

Write some real articles instead of perpetrating your industrial espionage for other companies who are no doubt lining your pockets with spare change.

James Viljoen on February 13, 2009, 3:23 pm

Sipho, you a blind man. I laugh at you..ha ha ha. Do you really believe that the ANC under Zuma is not the same ANC under Mbeki?

Nwali Unknown on July 20, 2009, 2:04 pm

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or sign up to comment

click here to log in

M&G Online Comment Guidelines In Brief

No hate speech;
No racist, sexist or homophobic remarks;
Keep it short;
Keep it on topic;
Show respect to all;
We reserve the right to remove or delete any comment without notice or reason.

Click here for the full Comment Guidelines

Advertising Links

Click hereÖ

Your M&G Online

Follow the Mail & Guardian on Twitter!

Direct message us on our mailandguardian account to chat to the M&G Online team.


		THIS WEEK'S PAPER Subscribe Subs promotions Get digital edition

Advertising links

OUDE MEESTER INSURANCE JUNCTION PROPERTY FOR SALE INTERNET SOLUTIONS COMPAQ LAPTOPS	MAP SEARCH HOLIDAY FINDER BID OR BUY INSURANCE YOU CAN TRUST

Bosasa's tender touch

Related Articles

Tags

People

Organisations

M&G Online Comment Guidelines In Brief

Your M&G Online

Advertisements

Advertising links