THE SMART NEWS SOURCE | Mar 16 2010 10:04 | LAST UPDATED Mar 16 2010 10:04 |
|
Mike Sutcliffe seems finally to have bitten off more than he can chew. The eThekwini municipal manager has made a political virtue of a "chew-up-and-spit-out" approach to his critics -- mainly the opposition, media and Durban's ratepayers. But two projects that book-end his time as manager are proving indigestible. The first is the endlessly controversial 2003 decision to outsource Durban's municipal bus service. The contract was awarded to Remant-Alton, a consortium consisting of the politically well connected (the chairperson was former ANC provincial treasurer Diliza Mji) and the ethically challenged, including a chief executive convicted of bribing a municipal official. When these issues were raised, Sutcliffe reportedly said: "Nothing with affect this deal. This disclosure will have no impact. The company followed the tender procedure." Since then, the bus service has lurched from disaster to disaster, forcing the city into regular bailouts and, last year, the repurchase of the bus fleet for R405-million. Remant-Alton denies wrongdoing, but questions persist about whether the city's unswerving commitment was linked to donations to regional ANC coffers. But Sutcliffe's greater challenge may flow from the unlikely alliance of academics, architects and street-traders fighting the city's plan to allow developers to build a mall at the unique Warwick Junction. Last September Sutcliffe and his 2010 team tabled a confidential proposal in the city's executive committee to offer a developer, Warwick Mall, a 50-year lease on the site. This would involve the demolition of a listed building, the 1910 Early Morning Market, where Durban's market gardeners sell their wares, and the displacement of some street-traders, who rely on a taxi and train hub through which 300 000 commuters move at rush hour. The proposal, part of Durban's 2010 facelift, was advertised for comment only in March this year, with the planned "temporary relocation" of traders scheduled for end-May. The announcement hit unexpectedly widespread resistance. The KwaZulu-Natal Institute of Architects (KZNIA) submitted a formal objection and met Sutcliffe and his team. Said KZNIA president Miles Pennington: "The city intends leasing a very important commercial site in Durban's Warwick Junction to a private developer, evicting hundreds of street traders at very short notice and under false pretences, as well as lessees of space in the Early Morning Market -- all so that a developer of their choice -- no tender process was followed -- can lease the land for 50 years and build a shopping mall. No urban planning, no analysis of precedent, no traders, no informal economy!" The KZNIA's call for proper planning and consultation in an area they say forms part of "what makes Durban, Durban" fell on deaf ears. The council approved Sutcliffe's proposal four days later. But traders and other institutions have dug in their heels. Amafa, the provincial heritage body, has rejected the mall plan, while architects have questioned its economics, which entail unquantified city subsidies. A rowdy and well-attended public meeting last week drew a commitment from deputy mayor Logie Naidoo to consult further. A march by hundreds of traders this week to present a petition to Sutcliffe was blocked at the last minute after police denied permission. Caroline Skinner, researcher at the University of KwaZulu-Natal's school of development studies, says: "There are 673 trading sites there and over 50 market gardeners sell their produce. These traders supply other informal traders throughout the city and are an important part of the city-wide fresh produce distribution chain. "By month-end the city aims to move them to temporary accommodation with no knowledge of where, and if, they will be accommodated longer-term… The traders have resolved that they won't budge." Traders are backed by the formidable Streetnet -- an international informal traders' network - and have drawn support from South African Communist Party, despite the city's intense behind-the-scenes lobbying to isolate and portray them as dominated by Indian interests. TOPICS IN THIS ARTICLE
Comments
Sutcliffe must go. He is completely intolerant to criticism and seems far more worried about making his masters happy than what is good for Durban. I hope those traders block the Warwick development, behind all the political rhetoric its just another example of the politically connected fatcats walking all over the poor. And what about our water quality Sutcliffe? Got our blue flag status back yet?
chris on June 1, 2009, 3:12 pm
In the late 90s I encountered Dr Sutcliffe when he ran the exercise to redraw Municipal boundaries. He came across strongly as a man who preferred not to be confused with facts and he left a legacy of ludicrous boundaries in the part of South Africa where I live. It proved so unworkable in some places that changes have been made.
The present proposals demonstrate clearly that time has improved nothing. If I add to this the costly exercise of changing Durban street names, which he presumably oversaw, then he is a man who will leave an enviable? legacy. During a recent visit to Durban I noticed with interest (and frustration) that a widespread response to the changing of such politically charged street names as "Broadway", "Argyle", "Essenwood" has been for persons unknown to obliterate the new names, so that navigation is made more difficult. As I see it, this is another splendid contribution to a harmonious nation.
Mike Young on June 1, 2009, 9:18 pm
Sutcliffe has no respect for Durban's poor.
From Below on June 1, 2009, 11:37 pm
Check out this link. It's a letter to Mr. Sutcliffe from the Freedom of Expression Institute. It details how the Shack Dwellers march was unconstitutionally subverted. When the highest powers of the country disregard the constitution and the rule of law this culture is obviously going to trickle down to the local authorities and law enforcement.
http://www.fxi.org.za/PDFs/ACP/Shackdwellers/Mike Sutcliffe letter 2.pdf
chris wylde on June 2, 2009, 3:49 am
I seethe every time I travel along Northway to see that's it's been renamed something retarded and irrelevant to the people who live there. It's the same in all the other northern-suburbs' areas - the foisting on the ratepayers of politically charged names of arbitrary nonentities. I rejoice when I see the painted-out and defaced signs and applaud the people who did so. It seems that the municipality of this relaxed city is riding roughshod over the people who pay their salaries - and it is therefore not surprising that similar high-handed actions are at play in Warwick Road. It's time Sutcliffe and his mates were dismissed.
Justin on June 2, 2009, 4:52 pm
I always find it more than amusing that, dare I call Sutcliffe a man, was able to run away to the USA and now pretend that he is this struggle hero who work in the interest of the people.
What struggle Mike, you hide away you do not know what suffering is? You lived like a king in the US. Is that why you Brown nose and hate your white skin. White guilt got too much for you. It has become obvious over time that you are willing to use the ratepaying publics money to cover for your personal guilt. You waste it willy nilly on anything that will get you one step higher on the ANC ladder.
Hugh Robinson on June 5, 2009, 8:30 am
Here we go again. Sam Sole's latest attempt at pushing his right-wing agenda - this time obstructing the progress required to give Durban the facelift it badly deserves.
1. The street name changes are a GOOD thing for many reasons. Read this blog for a more complete discussion: http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/andrewmiller/2009/03/12/getting-it-wrong-101-durban-changes-name/ 2. You guys speak of "saving" the Warwick Junction but did ANY of you have the guts to even walk through the Warwick Junction area? This area experience high traffic because anyone driving from downtown to any of the western parts of greater Durban MUST pass through this eyesore. Not only is it one of the most DANGEROUS places to walk, it is squalid and decaying! The Warwick areas historical significance has long since been obliterated by the apartheid government in the name of progress during the 70s. The multi-cultural community of Coloreds, Indians and Africans were forcibly kicked out to outlying townships while the area was transformed by the apartheid government into the mess it currently is. If Durban has to host a 2010 world cup soccer match, then it needs to present its best face to the world. Just think of the lengths China went to give Beijing a facelift to host the Olympics. Revamping the Warwick Junction will not only create thousands of jobs, and give Durban a facelift, it will reinvigorate tourism in the city once again. Its nuts to oppose this project!
Dave Harris on June 5, 2009, 8:35 am
Pay pay pay pay pay .... ad infinitum... equals nothing. Soul destroying stuff. That's all i can say. Anything more will probably get me sued.
Peter Lewis on July 8, 2009, 9:13 pm
click here to log in
M&G Online Comment Guidelines In Brief
Advertising Links
|
Find all your Unisa books you require for your studies and get them delivered right to your doorstep!
It's sale time again with fantastic savings on 1 000s of titles. Get some of the best books at discounted prices now.
46 000 DVDs and Blu-Ray Dics to choose from. Get up to 60% off at the Orange Sale.
100s of new releases now in stock! Sade, Foo Fighters, John Mayer & more!
Lots of Toys, free gift wrap, lowest prices on Lego Mindstorm, Ben 10, Hannah Montana & more!
AdvertisementsAdvertising links |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||






