THE SMART NEWS SOURCE | Feb 09 2010 19:50 | LAST UPDATED Feb 09 2010 19:50 |
|
The hand-wringing, lip-biting angst of yet another ICC failure will no doubt continue for a few weeks yet -- and the pain and embarrassment will be at their height while the semifinals and final of the Champions Trophy are still taking place on South African soil. "Choking" in International sport is commonplace, especially when a desperately sought-after goal comes sharply into focus, but that wasn't the problem this time. Nobody choked and nobody was strangled by the occasion. The problem, for good or bad, was more one of technical preparation than mental frailty or psychology. The Proteas stumbled, almost by accident, on a winning formula in the home series against Australia six months ago and stuck to it with a faith that was as blind as it was commendable. "Never change a winning team" is a sports theme that has existed for centuries but has become more and more outdated with every year in which video and other technological research options on the opposition increase and improve. South Africa bowled poorly against England in Centurion on Sunday, there can be no doubt, but the most dramatic realisation for the home side was that the opposition knew exactly what to expect and had coordinated their game plan to suit the formulaic approach that was once the prerogative of the Hansie Cronje era. The Cronje era was famous for an unprecedented win record of almost 80%, but his reliance on a set formula led to his team expecting the result to be the same every time and when things went wrong, especially in big games, they froze. Lack of options and scant scenario planning created the chokers tag. And not entirely unfairly. Graeme Smith and Mickey Arthur exist in a different era -- today the game moves forward at a faster pace than ever. Although they have enjoyed the longest -- and well deserved -- rest of their careers and worked on physical conditioning, the rest of the world studied their route to the number one ranking and devised strategies to counter it. The formula that dismantled Australia in March was studied, at leisure, by everyone. Steyn and Parnell with the new ball. Kallis and Morkel to share the third seamer's role, Botha and Van der Merwe to bowl in tandem in the middle overs and Steyn and Parnell to finish at the "death" of the innings. With a bit of Duminy off-spin if required. It was brilliant and worked largely because two members of the attack were unknown and another had a viperous sting in his armour called the "doosra". But Parnell and Van der Merwe have now been scrutinised and Johan Botha has been banned from bowling the delivery that spins away from the righthander because his arm is said to extend beyond the permitted 15 degrees. The bowling was poor, but a large part of South Africa's problem was their predictability. England's pre-game team meeting focused on four things: don't get out to Steyn, wait for the bad ball from Parnell, attack the third seamer (Morkel) and don't allow the spinners to settle into a rhythm. England believed strongly that Morkel's confidence was brittle, and that Botha and (especially) Van der Merwe, were spikey individuals who would respond poorly to early pressure. And they were right. But as much as the competitive spirit of the spinners will see them through, Morkel's role as third seamer -- even when shared with Kallis -- may be doomed. As gloriously as his Kluseneresque hitting entertains the crowds, and even wins matches, as it did in Australia at the beginning of the year, Mike Procter and his fellow selectors will now have to address the value of Morkel's batting against the liability of his bowling. And what of JP Duminy's calm, controlled demeanour at the crease when six or seven runs an over are required? It is one thing to display confidence and retain the moral high ground but quite another to get the job done. Duminy looks elegant under pressure, even serene, but sometimes you need to get your hands dirty and scrap for every run. There are times when playing the ball on its merits doesn't work. Sri Lanka probably have the most talented and well-balanced squad in the tournament, but they, too, have been eliminated, whereas India's millionaires played like paupers. New Zealand, meanwhile, lost three key players to injury during their three group games but cruised into the semifinals. That's the beauty of sport. It is not predictable and was never meant to be. All you can do is practise more and try harder -- and make sure you've got the best people in your team. At least nobody can have any doubt that Graeme Smith and Mickey Arthur will be doing all three of those things in the coming weeks. TOPICS IN THIS ARTICLE
Comments
There is one consistent thing with Proteas is failing to win an ICC tournament. why this is? Choking
Jabu Ncayiyana on October 2, 2009, 10:59 am
Plan B, courage, and fighting spirit lacked in the Proteas performance throughout the tournament.
Let me put special emphasis. The team lacks balance as well. If Smith, De Villiers and Kallis are not on form in a game, we know for sure that we are going to lose. We need more courageous match winners in the team. Sometime when the technical (tactics) side of your games fails, adaptability, natural skill and ability should win you games. Our Protea squad lacks the latter.
Budah Sterah on October 2, 2009, 11:51 am
Choking refers to the situation of a team that has been performing very well suddenly performing very poorly in a crucial match. That has happened to the Proteas in previous tournaments, but it was not the case here. In this case, as the article's author says, it was mostly a lack of intelligent preparation, which would have included tactical flexibility. And also: poor bowling.
Paddy II on October 2, 2009, 2:31 pm
True about the Cronje era and then we saw the difference between us and Australia - grit, determination, national pride and everything that makes the Aussies what they are - formidable in any sport. I think we have the talent, loads of it, we have the staff and coaches but I rarely see hunger to win...
Andrew Mc Farlane on October 2, 2009, 3:19 pm
Fire the coach and the captain. England changed and they now look good.
felas MuAfrica on October 2, 2009, 3:58 pm
You've got to transform the team. South African Whites sportsmen are way too conservative and it shows in their whole demeanor. Jacques Kallis is too big for the team, and he should focus on Test cricket. Blacks are more radical and are prepared to take risks. That cricket team is now more untransformed than it ever was. But nobody is going to accept criticism because only money talks, regardless of how pathetic they play.
Look what Peter De Villiers did with the mainly White Springboks. If Jake White was still in charge, we'd still be hoping for a Tri-Nations win.
Leon McClusky on October 2, 2009, 4:15 pm
Leon McClusky, do you expect to be taken seriously when you say things like "Blacks are more radical and are prepared to take risks"?
To say nothing of the absolutely groundless racial profiling, here are three examples that refute your statement: AB de Villiers, Graeme Smith and Albie Morkel. All white, all players with flair. > If Jake White was still in charge, we'd still be hoping for a Tri-Nations win Shit yeah, I guess we'd just have to make do with the World Cup. (And the Tri-Nations, which came this year under de Villiers, was won by a team with hardly more supposedly 'more radical and risk-loving' black players.) Seriously, if you can't talk sense, do us all a favour and keep it under wraps.
Paddy II on October 2, 2009, 6:13 pm
Hi Jabu Ncayiyana
They didn't choke.The debacle in the World Cup may have been influenced by the Administrators, It was great to see the Sri Lankans take on the Pakistanis after that dreadful terrorist incident in Pakistan.Other losses I can attribute to other forces at play. Look carefully and you will be able to see a similarity with Hansies Game Plans. Somebody is cheating the SA public. Wonder who that can be?
Donald Mathray on October 2, 2009, 8:32 pm
I've read several articles written by Neil Manthorp and whenever it comes to India, Indian cricketers and the BCCI, he is highly prejudiced. Sour grapes?
In this article, where he sets out to analyse SA's early exit, he dismisses the Indian team in one sentence: 'Millionaires playing like paupers!' This is simply not true. While the Indians didn't play to their potential, luck was not on their side either. First of all the opening match against Pakistan was a game they could have won as they cruising along during the chase, and secondly the game against Australia was a washout. India could well have won it....nobody knows! They did trounce the WI in a lost cause. But its easy to forget that Sehwag, Zaheer & Yuvraj were missing, guys who could turn a match on its head single-handedly! So Mr. Manthorp, a little more objectivity and respect towards Indian players would be much appreciated.
Ramesh Shotham on October 3, 2009, 12:08 am
Hi Ramesh
The Indian players continue to prove that they are "paper tigers". Great in India but pathetic outside. You do have some great players though : Zaheer,Yuvraj and Gambir. Tendulkar should be put to pasture. Cheers
Donald Mathray on October 3, 2009, 4:13 pm
click here to log in
M&G Online Comment Guidelines In Brief
Advertising Links
|
2,3-million titles to choose from.
iPod nano 16GB - Black, Was R2,499.00 Now R2,299.00! Save R200!
46 000 DVDs and Blu-Ray on sale now!
100s of new releases now in stock. Get the new Sade & Bon Jovi albums.
Widest toy range and unbeatable prices!
AdvertisementsAdvertising links |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||






