Mail & Guardian Online
THE SMART NEWS SOURCE | Feb 10 2010 08:08 | LAST UPDATED Feb 10 2010 08:08
News | National | Politics

Mantashe: Debate over planning commission settled

JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA Nov 16 2009 07:24
comments 4 comments | Post your comment


The debate in the ruling alliance over the National Planning Commission has been settled, ANC secretary general Gwede Mantashe said on Sunday.

“In particular, we agreed that there is a need for the NPC located in the Presidency, which will be chaired by the Minister in the Presidency for the NPC and whose main responsibility will be to
ensure an integrated strategic planning across government,” Mantashe said, addressing a media briefing after a three-day alliance summit with the South Africa Communist Party, the Congress of South African Trade Unions and the South African National Civics Organisation.

“That debate is settled now,” he said, flanked by Cosatu president, Sdumo Dlamini and SACP general secretary, Blade Nzimande.

Cosatu was vocal in its criticism of the Minister in the Presidency Trevor Manuel's Green Paper on National Planning, saying it vested too much power in the former finance minister's hands.

An alliance discussion document addressed issues raised by Cosatu but the union federation wanted the commission to be headed by the president. The ANC reiterated its support for Manuel to chair the commission after its national executive committee meeting -- and the union has accepted this.

“The broad thrust of that latest document is acceptable to us and that there are issues that still remain, to be nuanced and worked on, but that excludes the issue of chairing which we have settled on,” said Dlamini.

“Our appeal is that people don't raise this matter anymore, it's not an issue.”

An alliance task team on macroeconomic policy would "remain seized with reviewing and broadening the mandate of the Reserve Bank".

Mantashe described the talks as “difficult, complex and long”, saying there was no “soft, soft approach” on the issues under discussion. He added that the talks were one of “the most important summits” since the 1990's.

CONTINUES BELOW


“We come out of this summit more stronger because a robust engagement is pulling parties together. I don't think you are going to see more public disagreements, [but] you're going to see more robust debates in public because we don't want to suppress that,” he said.

While the issue of Eskom's management woes did not emerge at the gathering, Mantashe said the parastatal's 45% price-hike application was a cause for concern.

“We are definitely uncomfortable with the 45% times
three ... we are looking at all various options ... we are looking at them [and] we want to come up with a proposal by the end of the month,” he said.

The summit reaffirmed education as a key priority. A mass campaign for basic education would include the “enforcement of ‘non-negotiables'” agreed to at the previous alliance education summit. - Sapa
TOPICS IN THIS ARTICLE

Related Articles

People

Organisations

Comments

the only reason the alliance agreed to keep manuel on as the head of the npc,was to settle rattled investors who have become accustomed to manuels policy appraoch.it is really sad that the alliance cannot get over petty personal political vendettas and allow expediency to to prevail over principles.really sad.while the summit was a watershed in terms of clearing the who's who in south african government,it remains a challenge that sacp and cosatu put away their tantrums because they might cost the country a lot in the future.
zamo gasela on November 16, 2009, 10:17 am
power is a profoundly interesting concept.

in the context of the noise in the mainstream media with regard to deployments, it is interesting to note the almost independent reporting on the issue of trevor manuels role. or as i call it, deployment. it emerged to me yesterday that bobby godsell was deployed by the anc to the eskom board. or will that be the alliance? it is stated in the same article by gwede mantashe how some deployments work out and some dont!

i then take a moment to reflect on this deployment issue. paul wolfowitz and alan greenspan comes to mind. the choice of these two is intentional. one worked out and the other, however loyal to the conservatives cause, from christian fundamentalism (iraq and afghanistan) to neo-colonialism through his actions at the bank, did not work out. world politics are littered with these examples. ok, ok some will say the greenspan legacy should include the current recession. hehehe

the point i am trying to make is that there is something fishy about the media's take on deployments in this country. when elephants battle, it is the ants that are killed. politicians all over the world work with people who they can trust. a country still looking to government for basics like ours is a sign of non-development which will normmally take time. so the most pressing issues for us as a society cannot be deployment. besides, a combination of things like the apartheid history, affirmitive action, black economic empowerment simply means that not deploying people you know will undermine transformation. so yes, this will be fodder for a 24 hour news cycled media but in the main the government is in the right direction.

problem is the media in this country can be powerful if they figure out how to be so. fortunately for the politicians, our media is still wet behind the ears on how to be influential with the biggest voting block, the Black populace whom they have patronised, at best. so they fight directly with the politicians. and as such, we get fed with rubbish that can be totally irrelevant to our daily lives.

in short, cut the nonsense about deployments. suitably qualified or not, rather get the deployee to have a project manager. the problem has never been deployments themselves, but inability to execute. no one is asking of these deployees to conceptualise policy, that is done at anc level. so we do not need geniuses in government. just press the need for project management. unless, the media is peddling an agenda to have certian preferred people in these positions. that is entirely possible! in south africa...

edwin matlapeng
Edwin Matlapeng on November 16, 2009, 11:02 am
I dream of the day when our leaders do not have time for endless debates because they are too busy delivering on what has already been promised to our people.....
Jacqui Rennie on November 17, 2009, 3:44 am
“The broad thrust of that latest document is acceptable to us and that there are issues that still remain, to be nuanced and worked on, but that excludes the issue of chairing which we have settled on,” said Dlamini.
Have you every read such bullsh..t. The only thrusting that is being done here is up our collective (I will leave your imagination to the rest)The balls these okes have got is unbelievable. The jostling for positions at the piggy trough has been decided. Manuel gets to agree who gets what and how much. The only thing sticking out of Manuels ass are the prada shoes that blade and his buddies are wearing. It is sickening to the core. Bastards
Apocalypse Now on December 10, 2009, 10:33 am
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or sign up to comment
click here to log in

M&G Online Comment Guidelines In Brief

  • No hate speech;
  • No racist, sexist or homophobic remarks;
  • Keep it short;
  • Keep it on topic;
  • Show respect to all;
  • We reserve the right to remove or delete any comment without notice or reason.

Click here for the full Comment Guidelines

Advertising Links



LATEST ARTICLES IN THIS SECTION
POPULAR ARTICLES IN THIS SECTION
Kalahari.net
2,3-million titles to choose from.
iPod nano 16GB - Black, Was R2,499.00 Now R2,299.00! Save R200!
46 000 DVDs and Blu-Ray on sale now!
100s of new releases now in stock. Get the new Sade & Bon Jovi albums.
Widest toy range and unbeatable prices!




Follow the Mail & Guardian on Twitter!


Direct message us on our mailandguardian account to chat to the M&G Online team.
THIS WEEK'S PAPER

Advertisements


Advertising links