THE SMART NEWS SOURCE | Feb 10 2010 04:13 | LAST UPDATED Feb 10 2010 04:13 |
|
International comparisons show that the average South African will not live longer than 50 years, the South African Institute of Race Relations (SAIRR) said on Thursday. According to its latest South Africa Survey, the country was one of only six out of a group of 37 developed and developing countries that had a decreasing life expectancy between 1990 and 2007. "South Africa's life expectancy decreased from 62 years in 1990 to 50 years in 2007," the SAIRR said. Only Zimbabwe had a worse trend for life expectancy, it said. According to the survey, in 2009, average life expectancy at birth for South Africans was 51 years. Between 2001 and 2006 the life expectancy was 51 years for males, and 55 years for females. "This is expected to decrease between 2006 and 2011 to 48 years for males and 51 years for females," the SAIRR said. KwaZulu-Natal had the lowest life expectancy at birth in 2009 at 43 years, followed by the Free State and Mpumalanga at 47 years each. According to the survey, these three provinces also had some of the highest HIV prevalence rates at 16%, 14% and 14% respectively. Fewer children It also emerged in the survey that South African women are having fewer children There were an average of 2,7 live births per 1 000 women between 2001 and 2006 and this was projected to decline to 2,4 between 2008 and 2011. Along with fewer births, there had also been an increase in the number of deaths from HIV/Aids. Almost half of all deaths in 2008 were HIV/Aids related, an increase from a third of all deaths in 2001. This followed an increase in the HIV-positive population, from 9% in 2001 to 12% in 2008. "The survey shows that in SA the spread of HIV/Aids as well as lower fertility rates has led to a declining population growth rate," said SAIRR researcher Gail Eddy. Between 2007 and 2008, the country's population grew at a rate of 0,8%. "This is compared to a higher population growth rate of 1,5% between 2001 and 2002. "The 43% reduction in the population growth rate over seven years highlights the extent to which the HIV/Aids pandemic is affecting the SA population." Orphans, child-headed households on the increase Statistics in the survey show that by 2015 32% of all children in the country would have lost one or both parents due to HIV/Aids. "As HIV/Aids continues to affect the life-spans of parents, more and more children are going to be orphaned," Eddy said. In 2007, the SAIRR noted that about 2 500 000 children in South Africa had lost one or both parents, with more than half of all of these deaths a result of HIV/Aids. Between 2002 and 2007, the number children who had lost both their parents doubled from 352 000 to 701 000. KwaZulu-Natal, the province with the highest HIV/Aids infection rate, also had the highest number of orphans in 2007 at 229 000, the survey found. The number of child-headed households had also risen as a result of the HIV/Aids pandemic. According to the survey, between 2002 and 2007 the number of children living in child-headed households rose by 25% to 148 000 from 118 000. Eddy said there were limited safety nets for orphaned children. "The Department of Social Development has a budget which is geared towards the delivery of social grants, such as child support grants. "However, vulnerable children need additional support that is not necessarily monetary in nature as these children have also lost their primary care-giver." She said that South Africa had a shortage of social workers responsible for identifying vulnerable children. -- Sapa TOPICS IN THIS ARTICLE
Comments
Andre Scheepers on November 19, 2009, 4:09 pm
Andre, this make for interesting reading. But it doesn't take away from the fact that Apartheid was indeed an evil system driven by bigots and white supremacists.
But the point you make is a very valid one - if the Apartheid government could improve life expectancy, why can a free and democratically elected government not do the same? Something is rotten in the state of Azania.
Concerned Citizen on November 19, 2009, 4:34 pm
I echo 'concerned citizen' the new administration should have been able to maintain the pace, they inherited the facilities and the bank accounts among other things.
fred sevillano on November 19, 2009, 4:41 pm
Here's the truly terrifying thing - there's still no clear indication of a change-of-heart among South Africans toward safer sex practices. According to the latest data, more than 1,000 of our brothers and sisters are dying every day, and 1,300 are becoming infected every day. You don't need matric maths to understand that the epidemic is getting worse.
The landslide vote for a self-confessed philanderer (that's someone who screws around) to the presidency was our way of raising a middle finger to the world, and to the epidemic. Unfortunately the virus doesn't care what we say and think - it only cares what we do. And boy, does it LOVE what we do. An epidemic is like a parastatal - it needs skillful management, or else we all pay the price. The long-term fiasco of our (so called) prevention campaigns, and the continuing cock-ups with the procurement and dispensing of ARVs, will shape our nation for a century - there's no longer any doubt about it. I would propose that we change our national flag to show a condom stapled to a letter (so the staple renders the condom useless). The letter can be filled with empty rhetoric about how deeply our government is committed to our health and welfare. And no, this isn't a metaphor, it actually happened. At least there are no shortages of monuments to Thabo Mbeki and Manto Tshabalala Msimang - you can see them being erected by the thousand, every time you drive past a cemetery.
Alastair Grant on November 19, 2009, 4:46 pm
What about the correlation between the increasing amount of violent crime in SA and the decreasing life expectancy...?
Franc Parleur on November 19, 2009, 5:21 pm
"At least there are no shortages of monuments to Thabo Mbeki and Manto Tshabalala Msimang - you can see them being erected by the thousand, every time you drive past a cemetery." Very powerful image, Alastair, and all too sadly true.
I think that one of the terrible legacies of the apartheid government was that it made the masses very distrustful of the institutions of the state. Although this is understandable, it is partly responsible for the terribly legacy of the ANC. If you destroy or don't respect the institutions of the state, you destroy the very fabric of society -- lawlessness reigns. This is so deeply embedded in the ANC's psyche that I fear it will never change - or change only too late. The ANC and its followers think that they are above the law, not accountable, and thus that their behaviour has no consequences. This failure to take responsibility for one's actions is now part of the national psyche -- everyone else gets blamed for our problems. But, as Alastair has also pointed out, the virus will make us pay for our actions -- Unfortunately, it is not only the rapist and the philanderer who contract HIV, but their innocent victims.
Ella Hume on November 19, 2009, 5:51 pm
Andre Scheepers on November 19, 2009, 4:09 pm Andre, I have also read these stats somewhere. What radical stats. Are they absolutely true. If so, I would then understand clearer the comment I heard by an old black man on TV a while back. He said he had a better life during apartheid. I found this almost unbelievable. So with our modern medical wonders we are going the wrong way surely. We should be living longer. Ella, I agree with you. These dooses are so busy blowing smoke up each others asses and patting each other on the back that they can't see the damn house in on fire.
Apocalypse Now on November 19, 2009, 9:06 pm
I'd be more than a bit sceptical about statistics during the Apartheid period.I can't imagine anyone going round with a clipboard recording every death in the Bantustans. At least now things are open and papers like M & G are better able to comment on what's happening.
I'm not so sure I'd be making such comparisons between the two periods as the rest of you without robust figures.
Violet Wagner on November 19, 2009, 11:06 pm
I wouldn't want to absolve the current government of responsibility for its part in the current crisis, but it is worth noting that the biggest reason for this drop is HIV-related deaths, and the pandemic did start to have a real impact just as the apartheid government were on the way out, so ANY government in the same time-frame would show increasing mortality and a decrease in life-expectancy [that is, this data alone doesn't show how the apartheid government would have addressed the full brunt of the pandemic].
Again though, pretty much nobody disputes that the government's response could have led to a far less serious situation, and Aids-denialism is responsible for a lot of evitable damage. Thing is, the impact of HIV/Aids is heaviest in the poorest, least resourced, least educated communities. Those communities are as poor and isolated from assistance BOTH as a direct result of apartheid policies that left them especially vulnerable AND post-apartheid policies that increased the gap between rich and poor while mismanaging healthcare resources and persistantly underspending money allocated to healthcare. Denying or exclusively emphasising either half of that picture is self-evidently counter-productive.
Jason van Niekerk on November 20, 2009, 12:38 am
Can't argue with cold hard facts. Don't think the race card can be pulled here either. The grim reaper doesn't see colour.....guess the only people we can possibily blame is the ANC. I wonder who is responsible for more deaths: apartheid or the ANC?
paul vincent on November 20, 2009, 4:46 am
Andre, when you say "black South Africans had the highest per capita income and education levels in Africa during Apartheid", That is quite an ignorant statement, You mean that education that made the older generation into the perfect machinery for your economy and not for the advancement of their own people! Why do you think the Rand was always on par with Dollar? Beacuase we(whites) had all that GDP and Income, only used to better the lives of the minorites, while we thrived at the exploitation of the dark race, Dont tell that education BS, the only reason it was lower(life expectancy) before the implementation of apartheid, which I doubt is accurate. this statistic was mainly based on areas that had white population. And why "kill more of them you had free labour?
There are three types of lies namely: Lies, Damned lies and Statistics. And no the ANC can not be blamed for a bunch of ignorant people who refuse to use condoms, that is the real reason for such a low life expectancy in this beatiful country of ours. Check your facts straight. HIV is the real killer, Not ANC. We all see ads talking about HIV/AIDSs daily, who do we blame when this Ignorant people(I dont mean Black people necessarily) don't wanna listen. No as to fear that damn statistic, If you take Aids out the equation that number would way above 55.
LUF UNO on November 20, 2009, 9:57 am
There is three types of lies namely: Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics. To highlight this, Take HIV out the Equation, That will be ten years on top of that 48. It is only those who g with HIV/AIDS that are making it so low. If you have safe sex and know your partner, This should totally not be applicable to you at all. Lets face it, More than 60% of all people infected with disease, regrettably saying so, Got infected out their own Ignorant and carelessness.
HIV is the real killer not even crime, if you believe statistics Murder rates is a downhill. 49.6 in 2000 to 37.3 in 2008. To that old man who believes his life was better in Apartheid, the odds is that he he does not have a tertiary qualification. And the reason he believes life was netter in apartheid was because he did not mind being a 2nd class citizen and doing the garden, working in the mines ... there list is endless. We all know the types of jobs that were Reserved with so-called highest education in AFRICA.
LUF UNO on November 20, 2009, 10:28 am
I think what andre is trying to say is the ANC government until recently did nothing to educate the people on safe sex and on top of this denied its impact on our society. Another point is that in some cultures it seems acceptable to rape and is considered a mans right. Until this way of thinking is corrected the HIV/Aids will escalate. I am not sure about the stats Andre gave are correct as the apartheid government probably did not bother to include the black South African. The bottom line men, is keep your zipper up and if necessary take a cold shower -not afterwards though!
Lee van Zyl on November 20, 2009, 11:45 am
What a joke !
on November 21, 2009, 7:51 am
click here to log in
M&G Online Comment Guidelines In Brief
Advertising Links
|
2,3-million titles to choose from.
iPod nano 16GB - Black, Was R2,499.00 Now R2,299.00! Save R200!
46 000 DVDs and Blu-Ray on sale now!
100s of new releases now in stock. Get the new Sade & Bon Jovi albums.
Widest toy range and unbeatable prices!
AdvertisementsAdvertising links |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||







At the start of the year 1900, the number of African South Africans was found to be 3,5-million according to the British colonial government census. By 1954, the African population had soared to 8,5-million -- and by 1990, there were a full 35-million.
In the decades prior to the official policy of apartheid, (which was started in 1948), the average life expectancy of African South Africans was only 38 years.
However, during the last decade of the apartheid era from 1948 to 1994, the average life expectancy had risen to 64 years -- on a par with Europe's average life expectancy. Moreover, the infant death rates had by then also been reduced from 174 to 55 infant deaths per thousand, higher than Europe's, but considerably lower than the rest of the African continent's.
DID YOU KNOW THIS No, of course you didn't….because your view of evil has already been defined.