Dubious liaisons

Hypocrite! It is not what Moseneke want, but what the South African public deserves - the thruth and censure..........

Another imbecile - we do not have a shortage of those in these parts

This time you included smoke, mirrors and anything that stinks in your sadistic attempt to besmirch Jusge Moseneke. In spite of you own concluding statements (i.e that neither Brown nor Mwamba had anything to do with Judge Moseneke and that none of them either directly or indirectly interacted with Encha Group), you still proceed to title your article, "Dubious Liasons". Curiously, you do not indicate in what way Mwamba "facilitated" the deal for and behalf of Encha Group. Instead the entire piece is dedicated to Mwamba's apparent shady background but it is used, unfairly and with intended malice, to tarnish the Judge’s image.

Kaycee Potong on November 20, 2009, 11:53 am

Agree completely.

It's a horribly misleading article that casts aspersions on the judge for no sensible reasons.

I originally thought that Mwamba was active in the Encha Group - now it seems that at most he introduced someone to someone else.

Eish!

After realising that their 09 Nov 2009 MG front page was a furse and a censured news, MG comes again to try and print a whole lot of rubbish that does not add upto Moseneke issue. Mirrors, smokescreens are at the center of this article and I still say it now, our journalists are on somebody's payroll and until that thug is exposed, so as true journalism could prevail.

Ethics are suppose to guide journalists when doing their job, unless of course your are Mr Sole, Brummer, Mandy Rossouw, Manaledi Mataboge or ofcourse Mr "Hearsay" Alcock. I am a fan of MG but on quality news worth investigated and researched.....

Infact it was on the 13th, not 09th.

I remember how Jimmy Swaggart use to lambast "immorals" (The immoral people) Those who had sex before marriage and you know the rest, while in fact he was the dirtiest amongst all. Moseneke is not the sheep that you think he is, had there been a conspiracy it would have came out before nomination and appointment of judges, however the person with this info should find out more and nail the thug who presides over our cases, who knows maybe hid judgments are sometimes clouded by business interests. Moseneke involves himself too much in what shouldnt be of Judges interests, the comments he made about Zuma and appointing himself as chief justice before the process took place is an example, he acts big in a very small town

Agreed, the reporter spent 99% of this article on the supposed shdy coming's and going's of Nozi. What did all this have to do with the Judges family having oil rights in the Congo. However, if that is in fact true, I would definitley want it audited and or investigated. Most if not all oil deals are coupled with some corruption and bribery. Just by having his (Judges) name associated with this leaves a very bad smell. Maybe its perfectly innocent, but it is not likely.

Yet another case for the speedy implementation of The Media Tribunal !!!
How long can we be exposed to such shoddy journalism ...

for a while there i thot i was reading a diff article when i got to the body of it. i think the daily sun should be looking over its shoulder! this kind of thing wud not even make it on a high skool newspaper!

Can the real Moseneke tell us clearly why he is, of all people, associated with dubious people like these? True or not, the story needs to be taken forward and we must be told the truth by Moseneke himself.