Mail & Guardian Online
THE SMART NEWS SOURCE | Feb 10 2010 11:36 | LAST UPDATED Feb 10 2010 11:36
Business | General Business

Gordhan: Protectionism a risk to global growth

JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA Nov 26 2009 08:21
comments 2 comments | Post your comment


Trade protectionism is a serious risk to global economic growth as countries emerge from recession, Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan said on Wednesday.

In a speech prepared for delivery to the American Chamber of Commerce in South Africa, Gordhan also said Africa's economic powerhouse, which climbed out of recession in the third quarter of this year, needed to address the "very real and human costs" of the crisis after nearly one million jobs were lost.

Gordhan said South Africa's exports and imports were expected to decline by roughly 20% in 2009 compared with 2008 and that there was "quite a bit" to lose from a rise in protectionism.

"Trade protectionism is a serious risk to global economic growth. Enhancing fair and balanced trade is essential to growing incomes and ridding the developing world of poverty," he said.

Gordhan reiterated that the "carry trade" phenomenon, which has seen the rand currency surge more than 20% against the dollar this year on a wave of appetite for high yielding currencies, was a matter of concern for South Africa.

While the currency's strength has raised fears it could hit exports, both the government and the central bank have repeatedly said the exchange rate will continue to be determined by market factors, without interference from the authorities. -- Reuters

CONTINUES BELOW
TOPICS IN THIS ARTICLE

Related Articles

People

Comments

the problem with prav's feelings is that while protectionism is a risk to global growth, you don't join the free market with an unemployment rate that is so high that even with massaging the numbers, it's still 25%. you keep your markets as closed as possible until your unemployment rate is half that for a sustained amount of time.... and *then* do you open up.

funnily enough, this is exactly what the east asian economies did before letting western companies play in their pond, and why china waited so long before joining the wto.

imagine that.
ursa negro on November 26, 2009, 10:16 am
i am just a little curious. it is common knowledge that a complete removal of all protectionism cannot be implemented by virtue of the fact that pure capitalism does not exist. so which protectionist measures would Gordhan remove? what support would there be for industries that have been reliant in them?

If no protectionist measures were removed, but rather that some measures were relied on to a lesser extent than is the status quo, would that satisfy the problem of protectionism, or be a compromise that would not be much of a difference?
Tumi Ramafoko on November 26, 2009, 4:45 pm
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or sign up to comment
click here to log in

M&G Online Comment Guidelines In Brief

  • No hate speech;
  • No racist, sexist or homophobic remarks;
  • Keep it short;
  • Keep it on topic;
  • Show respect to all;
  • We reserve the right to remove or delete any comment without notice or reason.

Click here for the full Comment Guidelines

Advertising Links



LATEST ARTICLES IN THIS SECTION
POPULAR ARTICLES IN THIS SECTION
Kalahari.net
2,3-million titles to choose from.
iPod nano 16GB - Black, Was R2,499.00 Now R2,299.00! Save R200!
46 000 DVDs and Blu-Ray on sale now!
100s of new releases now in stock. Get the new Sade & Bon Jovi albums.
Widest toy range and unbeatable prices!




Follow the Mail & Guardian on Twitter!


Direct message us on our mailandguardian account to chat to the M&G Online team.
THIS WEEK'S PAPER

Advertisements


Advertising links