Mail & Guardian Online
THE SMART NEWS SOURCE | Feb 09 2010 22:11 | LAST UPDATED Feb 09 2010 22:11
News | National | Environment

Football to footprints: World Cup's carbon impact

Nov 28 2009 07:08
comments 10 comments | Post your comment


Africa's first Soccer World Cup will generate 2,75-million tonnes of carbon emissions, one of the biggest environmental impacts of any sporting event in history, a study has found.

The finals in South Africa next year are expected to have a carbon footprint eight times that of the 2006 World Cup in Germany, even before long-haul international travel is taken into account.

The main reasons for the discrepancy are the vast distances between South Africa's host cities and the lack of a green transport infrastructure.

The estimated output from South Africa is 896 661 tonnes of carbon dioxide, according to the optimistically entitled Feasibility Study for a Carbon Neutral 2010 Fifa World Cup, commissioned jointly by the South African and Norwegian governments. Another 1 856 589 tonnes will result from fans travelling from around the world, making the World Cup's footprint the biggest of any major event aiming to be "climate neutral", the report said.

It cites the geography of South Africa as the main culprit, forcing players, officials and supporters to travel great distances between the 64 matches spread across nine host cities. South Africa is five times the size of the UK. The distance from Cape Town to Johannesburg is 1 408km, the same as London to Warsaw, and it would take about 17 hours to drive.

South Africa's transport systems are also less eco-friendly than in many countries. "For inter-city transport ... distances between matches in South Africa are much greater than in Germany, and the lack of high-speed rail links means that most visitors will fly multiple times between matches, leading to much higher transport emissions," the report said. Within cities, they will use hired cars or buses, because there is no underground or light railway alternative.

But getting there will be the biggest contributor to the total of 2 753 250 tonnes of carbon. International transport represents 67,4% of emissions, intercity transport 17,6%, intracity transport 1,4%, stadium construction and materials 0,6%, stadium and precinct energy use 0,5%, and energy use in accommodation 12,4%.

The report said carbon offset programmes to counter the World Cup's impact would cost between $5,4-million and $9-million.

It called for the early implementation of carbon offset programmes from football's governing body, Fifa, the local organising committee and the South African government. These should be visible during the event to "maximise the contribution to public awareness".

CONTINUES BELOW


The local organising committee responded this week with a "green goal" initiative. It said the construction of Soccer City stadium, the venue for the opening ceremony and the first and final matches, used thousands of tonnes of builders' rubble from the demolition of parts of the old FNB stadium.

Waterless urinals will be used in the stadium and the pitch will be irrigated exclusively with non-drinkable water, the organising committee said. Waste reduction will be pursued, with reusable cups and limited use of food containers.

Buyelwa Sonjica, South Africa's environmental affairs minister, told Parliament this week: "Some progress has been conducted toward processes for offsetting the footprint. However, even the footprint on its own is huge in comparison to the 2006 Fifa World Cup footprint. At least three of the nine host cities have considered the implementation of bicycle lanes." - guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media 2009
TOPICS IN THIS ARTICLE

Related Articles

Tags

Comments

only cape town has mass transit that is anywhere close to adequate for the world cup venues.

that is, it's roughly 3km from the train station to green point stadium. most europeans will walk this distance without complaint -- and the final 1km they have to walk anyway, as that is the exclusion zone. so, really 2km from the train station to the stadium grounds. you will note how the cape town taxi industry has pretty much written off the world up tourist crowd; they're not going to make any money from them.

it's a shame that commuter rail in other south african cities isn't so useful/clueful.
ursa negro on November 28, 2009, 7:51 am
"At least three of the nine host cities have considered the implementation of bicycle lanes." OH JUST F*CKING SHOOT ME ALREADY!!!! Is that it? Both Pathetic and Wow!
Marius de Kock on November 28, 2009, 10:00 am
Ok, so there is a "small" foot print, but do we actually make any profit????????????? Waterless urinals, well that should be fun. Will they also be supplying face masks to all entering the loo's. Geez, the field is going to be watered with NON drinkable water, er, what does that actually mean, I mean, would it bad to drink it? and has anybody thought of explaining this to the 500 oke's that are looking after this field. Last thing we need as a headline is "200 gardeners at soccer city die due to sipping water used for field"
Apocalypse Now on November 28, 2009, 10:16 am
We should not forget the sudden available power supply from Eskom
mj sun on November 28, 2009, 11:26 am
I'm getting tired of all these things about this world cup. We once heard of plan B which would be Australia or England, something we never heard before when the FIFA panel has decided on the host country, there is this crime this...crime that, there comes another story that also seeks to undermine the abiltiy to be successful hosts.
Nkanyiso Mathamba on November 28, 2009, 11:43 am
They are worried about carbon footprint - please get the basics right first before worrying about finer things like this. Waterless urinals will make the toilets an ammonia palace where no one will go. I have never heard of re-usable cups. This sounds like a big joke.
Pasta Bag on November 29, 2009, 7:42 am
Consider the proposed 'offsets' :
Re-usable cups - Bicycle lanes - Sewage irrigation - Waterless urinals - No food containers.

Fans and players will receive a check-list of must haves;
ticket,
bicycle,
plastic cup,
mask,
plastic plate.

And Fifa will ban fouling so that no players end up lying around in pools of urine.

Just a thought - if the 'waterless urinal' was scrapped all together - the fans could simply take a leak on the pitch then they could do away with irrigation too.
Ray Ives on November 29, 2009, 8:19 am
chihuaua comments abt- what a load of rubbish all u guys are churning out..where the hell do u live- u must be having pea sized brains? Are nt we all impressed that at least we know the impact of the world cup on the environment and can use that to intensify our efforts to have carbon neutral event..
2cents 2cents on November 29, 2009, 10:24 pm
I agree with 2 cents, and guess what... the costs of making the world cup a climate neutral event will cost LESS THAN 2 CENTS !! honestly... if only the LOC would listen to proposals already made, and start acting NOW... we could see the results on a massive scale by the time the whistle blows...
camille van Gestel on November 30, 2009, 1:01 pm
Its a blaty fraud ! ! ! ! !
When these people are gonna agree that, this global warming haox is busted. 1.3bn people in China, how much are they "poluting", over 300m in US, over 1 billion in India, and they are telling us that we would be doing more damage with just around 50million people during world cup, even worse, blaty population believe these scamers. They are working so hard to conveince fible minds that we are doing more harm in Africa to environment than industrialised countries .... worse of all you people believe them .... burn me at the stake... i give up ! ! ! !
Sipho Nkohla on December 7, 2009, 8:57 am
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or sign up to comment
click here to log in

M&G Online Comment Guidelines In Brief

  • No hate speech;
  • No racist, sexist or homophobic remarks;
  • Keep it short;
  • Keep it on topic;
  • Show respect to all;
  • We reserve the right to remove or delete any comment without notice or reason.

Click here for the full Comment Guidelines

Advertising Links



LATEST ARTICLES IN THIS SECTION
POPULAR ARTICLES IN THIS SECTION
Kalahari.net
2,3-million titles to choose from.
iPod nano 16GB - Black, Was R2,499.00 Now R2,299.00! Save R200!
46 000 DVDs and Blu-Ray on sale now!
100s of new releases now in stock. Get the new Sade & Bon Jovi albums.
Widest toy range and unbeatable prices!




Follow the Mail & Guardian on Twitter!


Direct message us on our mailandguardian account to chat to the M&G Online team.
THIS WEEK'S PAPER

Advertisements


Advertising links