THE SMART NEWS SOURCE | Sep 09 2010 09:26 | LAST UPDATED Sep 09 2010 09:26 |
|
Eskom is not an efficient producer, alternative energy sources have not been fully considered and, above all, a 35% price hike will only throw the country into a deeper socioeconomic abyss, the National Energy Regulator of South Africa heard on Friday. On the tenth and final day of countrywide public hearings, corporates, academics, human rights and wildlife groups, political figures and organised labour took the final opportunity to convince the Nersa panel not to support the proposed tariff increase. Since Eskom's last price hike, half-a-million jobs had been lost, Paul Crankshaw from the National Consumer Forum said in Midrand. "These people now have to be supported by relatives and friends, so everyone has to cut their spending." The SA Human Rights Commission tried to convince the panel to adopt a "people first" approach when considering the application. "While the SAHRC recognises that Eskom requires financial support, we are concerned about the impact of the 35% increase on the promotion of human rights as enshrined in our Constitution," senior researcher James Motha said. "A hike in electricity prices of 35% will further impoverish many and exacerbate existing inequalities." While there was no mention of electricity provision in the Constitution, power was important as it was seen as a basic service. 'Serious pain' Speaking on behalf of the Congress of South African Trade Unions, Dumisani Dakile said the price hike should be in line with inflation. He suggested instead of the proposed incremental increase of 35% each year for the next three years, a once-off tax of 1% should be looked into. He asked the panel to take the recent recession into account. “It's [like] a patient in an intensive care unit and when he is starting to recover somebody stabs that particular patient,” he said to laughter. Lorraine Lotter from the Chemical and Allied Industries Association said the increase would cause “serious pain”. “Then 769 000 people will move under the poverty line and 841 000 would move under the ultra poverty line," she said. James Hodge of Genesis Analytics said Eskom's approach to its funding for the next three years was inappropriate, and more robust analysis was needed to isolate the funding gap. The Freedom Front Plus contended the proposed increase was premature and a moratorium on the price should be implemented in the short term. "What we are asking for is more time. The decision made by Eskom is knee-jerk and hasty," said MP Anton Andries. 'Who is footing the bill?' Problems in Eskom's finances needed to be explored. The party felt farmers and households were carrying the load for non payment by municipalities and electricity use by illegal immigrants. “Who is footing the bill? To my mind it would be the households and the farmers," said Andries. Former Eskom manager Michael Deeds said the new Kusile power station was not the right offering for independent power producers (IPPs). "Kusile is too far in the future to make investment attractive for IPPs." Instead, he recommended that power stations like Lethabo be open to private equity. "With IPPs, bait needs to be offered -- hot bait that will make them come in now." The SA Local Government Association (Salga) said more expensive power would mean even more debt for already embattled municipalities. The Chamber of Mines and Salga both said it was premature for the increase to be decided on without a revised integrated resource plan (IRP) within the National Energy Act. “It is decision making in the absence of supporting documentation and guidance,” said the chamber's Dick Kruger. Salga spokesperson Mthobeli Kholisa said: "There was no public consultation and we don't know if the IRP is a legitimate document." There was also concern raised by the SA Pulp and Paper Industry over the “undocumented myth” that South Africa enjoyed cheap power. One of the recommendations was that Eskom should regularly publish the electricity price of other countries and benchmark South Africa's price against these. In a last attempt to appease “finger pointers”, Eskom's acting CEO Mpho Makwana argued the proposal was “good for South Africa”. “There's no doubt that in the short term of the current MYPD2 [second multi-year price determinant] period Eskom's solution is the only solution. “The impact of the tariff increase is not a one-size-fits-all [solution]. [But] if Eskom fails, we all fail. These are the key tenets that I think we should all take away from the Nersa hearings,” said Makwana. Nersa will make its decision in February. - Sapa TOPICS IN THIS ARTICLE
Comments
Pearson B on January 23, 2010, 8:27 am
The first part of the solution is to get competent engineers with experience.
Wiseman Kompela on January 23, 2010, 9:14 am
Eskom have no other choice, even if it means further job losses, businesses foreclosures and industries coming to a standstill.
These hearings are a waste of time. All they’ve achieved is the “community involvement” requirements, to proceed with the process. They will implement the purposed increases even suffering from "mental blackouts"?
Poly Ticks on January 23, 2010, 9:15 am
What totally-free, technologically-exploitable, yet infinitely renewable and reliable power-generating resource does sunny South Africa have in absolute ABUNDANCE?
No prizes for guessing, sunny South Africa.
Atlas Reader on January 23, 2010, 9:46 am
I agree with Atlas. The simplest and most effective idea I have heard is a plan for the government puts in place a decent subsidy for Solar Water heaters (Solar Geysers). If the Government pays half and the house owner pays half we will very quickly (maybe within 18 months) be able to generate an electricity savings equivalent to the power of one coal fired power station - without having to build one or keep it running - free energy basically.
Robin Grant on January 23, 2010, 9:59 am
Punish management severely..Set the example..
Change management..Give them 6-12 months... Then choose people of integrity and honour without self interest.. For example China builds an Eskom in one month.
mj sun on January 23, 2010, 10:07 am
ESKOM should be listed (NYSE, LSE and/or JSE)
The process worked well for SASOL This would prove to be a very popular listing and would raise the funding immediately. The SA Govt could keep 51% of the issued shares to keep the SACP happy. The Govt could transfer some of its share holding to the COSATU pension fund, which will keep them happy. By international standards the Capex required by Eskom is not large. By any business standard or model the Capex cannot come out of tarriffs, unless the intention is to shut the economy down.... then we won't need much electricity anyway, and the whole exercise becomes both futile and self defeating
Peter Auld on January 23, 2010, 10:16 am
Open the market to Energy Producers NOW, if Eskom fails then you can buy power from someone else. Prices are then determined by the market. Limit IPP's to 49% foreign ownership though. The IRP was a disgrace, communities should be allowed to generate power and sell it back to the grid.
Kev on the banks of the Danube on January 23, 2010, 10:34 am
Eskom will cause harm....blah blah blah, we've heard about that before. We were told that vehicles would cause harm, so would be cellphones, computers, fridges, airoplanes, the lot. By introducing them to humans, did we see any harm? not at all, instead we're reaping the benefits of hsaving them around. I believe it would be the same thing with pricve hikes of Eskom's tarriffs, we'll ultimately sow good stuff at the end. I'm with Eskom on this one-- hike the whole lot.
The Village Boy with a Diploma on January 23, 2010, 10:37 am
Globally it is the exact same – why ? Because the deals are cut at the global leaders meetings.
The outcomes are exactly the same – the fat cats get fatter and screw the poor and WE ALL are working for the banks. If the banks fail (all money trails lead back to the bank – including the government), the taxpayer bails them out. We all work for the banks, globally. If you look at how the money SYSTEM works, paper currency is debt. Money lenders changed to paper from gold ( as a written security) and realised they could charge INTEREST on other peoples money. What is inflation?? Who stands surety for all the money that governments borrow from the Federal / Reserve banks – it is the tax payers because governments do not generate money. How do they repay the HUGE debts ? - TAX and increases in monopolised industries that are people's needs - like electricity. It is a sickening thought that the Rothschild family (that own the Fed bank in USA and many others) have $500 trillion in their wealth, yup that is right, that is HALF the worlds wealth. Do you realise that this family’s fortune could end the complete planet’s crises? Man that is some thought. In South Africa you have the Ruperts that have their empires. Time to think out the box and take back the ground that has been lost. Take back the control from THE BANKS and the governments that are dictated to by the bank owners.
Andy Campbell on January 23, 2010, 10:43 am
Nice one Village Boy with Diploma! Harm, as in hike will poke the economy. Businesses will suffer, and soon after shut down, and we'll all have to return to the village and wipe our arses on our diplomas. That kind of harm.
touché douché on January 23, 2010, 10:48 am
It is in the ANC's interests, that eskom stuffed up. Its in the ANC's interests, that the price hikes are as high as they are.
They are profiting from the misfortune, that eskoms blunders have and will cause us. Unemployment will rise because of the hikes. Hence, there is no political will, from government, to fix the mess. It seems all the increases, are simply there, to pay for government incompetence. 35% hike for eskom, 1% tax hike for SABC... I will pay a 35% increase, but, there will be HELL to pay, if my power gets cut off then, or if a power spike takes out another one of my pc's.
Sinudeity @gmail.com on January 23, 2010, 10:54 am
Just when we think the ANC induced ESKOM crisis can get no worse we have to find they secured new partners in the shape of the Institute of Directors and Nic Holland of Goldfields. The Institute defending ANC "maorality" and Holland calling for additional tax to be levied. We know who carries this burden...you and I. See full story at:
http://letterdash.com/g.annandale/eskom-make-them-pay
George Annandale on January 23, 2010, 11:42 am
1. COSATU's proposal has some merit - make it 0.5%
2. Entirely privatise one or two underperforming or closed stations. 3. Sell solar and wind kits to the consumer and communities, who can then generate their own electricity. Allow competition from power companies who generate renewable energy. 4. Step up education efforts to try and get people to stop wasting electricity 5. Impose a 5% tariff increase Problem solved
Jy Wilmos on January 23, 2010, 12:38 pm
The threat of losing half a million jobs isn't a deterrent; it's an incentive to hike prices. The economy lost nearly a million jobs last year alone. Losing half that amount over three years as a result of doubling electricity prices isn't going to scare any policy makers. To them, it's a small price to pay and it'll be someone else who will be doing the paying.
Roger Pacey on January 23, 2010, 2:50 pm
There is not a brain amongst them and no man of vision in sight.
The ANC fancies the idea of a price hike - they own shares in this debacle - more money more dividends for them. It is all about feathering the nest and blow all to do with the country and its people. Don't be naive
sue topham on January 23, 2010, 3:13 pm
I would be happy to pay a tax that supplemented the cost of energy efficient devices (CFL & LED lights) and alternative energy methods (Solar & Gas).
I will not do everything in my power to avoid paying tax for an incompetent and corrupt parastatal which has done nothing to show that it has this countries interests at heart.
on January 23, 2010, 5:26 pm
On top of this, Morega is now sueing Eskom for R85 million if he isnt given his job back. This idiot, lived a lavish lifestyle, at our expense of 5 million year, and all the trimmings. Now, he wants to further cripple our country.
Exile him, he's done more harm to South Africa, then we can fathom.
Sinudeity @gmail.com on January 24, 2010, 3:38 am
@Andy Campbell
You are absolutely right. I found that out for myself many years ago and have written an ebook on the subject. I have also rolled in the fact that we must all take climate change more seriously. With a failed/unsecured global money system that has actually collapsed, the future for our children and grandchildren looks very bleak. Join me and others "out of the box" at: http://www.bobrobertson.net Cheers
Bob Robertson on January 24, 2010, 10:17 am
Use less electricity and find alternative sources and stop chasing talented people.
Ethicist#1 Fairplay on January 24, 2010, 11:57 pm
If you use LESS electricity, the Eskom power-generating monopoly will protect its bottom line simply by INCREASING the price of the electricity that is still being used.
Atlas Reader on January 25, 2010, 2:10 am
@ The Village Boy with a Diploma:"I'm with Eskom on this one-- hike the whole lot." Do you pay for your electricity or do you also steal it like thousands of other people?
Stort Kop on January 25, 2010, 7:39 am
The Escom issue is not simple. Nothing can be done to the past, however we can learn from it.
If Jacob Maroga was honest, his outgoing advice to Escom would be: Choose between affirmative action and reliable power supply, you cannot have both.
Wiseman Kompela on January 25, 2010, 9:52 am
For the USA of Africa,our energy supplier is negligent in relying
on power coal stations and allowing us as consumers to be in this mess.Those responsible for the development of our country need to be punished,removed,replaced and be given 6 months. No lavish self interest or lifestyle,No fancy bonuses,no creative accounting practices,no fancy anti competitive practices w.r.t other green technoligies,no nersa,Nno taxing of green technologies.If the job is not done...too bad.
mj sun on January 25, 2010, 10:08 am
Bob Roberson
Much as I think you intent good in your book, some of your suggesttions are what the creators of this mess want. In particular, your suggestion in regards to single currency and one global govermnment smell of tyranny. Amongst other factors, the current monetary system was created with one goal in mind, global government, single currency, overseen by the few elite. The CFR should be on cloud nine hearing your echoes of globalisation. Just my view that we should be careful in what we suggest, though we may intend good. Borrowing from one of book titles you researched from, 'tyranny of good intentions', is how I would sum up your views regarding the points I raised.
Relebohile Makhetha on January 25, 2010, 11:35 am
OH PLEEEEASE, The only group to see any kind of pain are the people that actually pay thier utilities bill. A full 80% of blacks don't pay at all, but get the service. (By hook or by crook) As for our beloved ANC well they are going to profit hansomely with the profits they make from all the "linked" tenders.
Apoc Rules on January 25, 2010, 5:08 pm
Eskom and our strucural disabled government got this country in trouble and they are failing to come up with a solution or strategies to curb the situation such as the susidies of solar system equipment or facilities and so on,it is unfair to a people who manages their finance with scrutiny(who tighten their belt where and when necessary)to suffer because of the bosses who failed to manage the company's finance yet they are getting paid fat cheques.That says a lot about the level of incompetence and of people running state owned enterprises,couldn't they achieve this 35% by 10% for atleast 3&1/2 years, what is it really that they've tried.
simile khanyile on February 23, 2010, 4:50 am
click here to log in
M&G Online Comment Guidelines In Brief
Advertising Links
|
Sponsored Media Releases
Pre-order your copy of FIFA 11 before the rush!
Buy Blu-Ray music this month and save 10% off all titles
Save when you by DVDs from our wide selection of 24hr DVDs
Super spring savings on a great selection of gadgets & accessories
Selected new fiction releases now only R150. Buy today & save!
AdvertisementsAdvertising links |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||







As for COSATU's kneejerk "tax the wealthy"? Are these people incapable of a single original thought....always the same, punish the people who create jobs. Why is the world run by morons?